Verizon says toxic plume isn’t its fault

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Verizon has cleared the air about reports that cancer-causing toxins seeping into the site of a future Whole Foods supermarket along the Gowanus Canal came from its property a block away.

“It’s definitely not from our site,” said company spokesman John Bonomo, citing air-quality tests conducted on Dec. 29 at Verizon’s First Street site.

“Environmen­tal scientists found absolutely no benzene,” he added. “Atmospheric readings were normal.”

The telecommunications giant tested the site when workers filed a complaint after The Brooklyn Paper revealed that crews cleaning up Whole Foods’ site on Third Avenue and Third Street told state officials that the Verizon property was “the likely source” of underground contaminants.

Verizon’s clean air test results had workers at the site breathing easier this week, though local union leaders want soil testing as well.

“We need to keep investigating until all questions are answered,” said Local 1109 president John Dempsey.

Traveling plumes of contaminated groundwater are common in areas where industry once thrived. Last year, for example, Keyspan detected benzene-laced groundwater traveling west towards hip Smith Street from a former gas production plant at Fourth Street and the canal.

In true Park Slope fashion, however, attendees of the Jan. 4 Park Slope Civic Council meeting cared more about traffic that the upscale megastore — with its 420-car parking lot — will bring to the area.

“We want to cut the traffic in our neighborhood and you seem to be encouraging people to drive,” Civic Council President Lydia Denworth told Whole Foods representatives.

Denworth and others called for a taxi drop-off area at the store and a shuttle service from distant subway stations along Fourth Avenue at Union Street or Ninth Street.

Whole Foods has promised to offer home delivery to cut down on the traffic to the store.

“The experts are telling us that traffic will not be an issue,” said David Ball, a traffic engineer working with the company. Ball added that they expect 1,500 cars per day, not 1,500 per hour, as some experts predicted.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.