Foes of Coney plan shut down meeting

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

A state senator who opposes Mayor Bloomberg’s Coney Island redevelopment plan claimed victory at the first public hearing on the proposal Monday night, boasting that he was able to shut down the meeting by bussing in hundreds of people to the event.

“Score one for the good guys,” state Sen. Carl Kruger (D–Bensonhurst) shouted to his supporters after the Coney Island Development Corporation hastily canceled the meeting. “We won the ground war. You made a point tonight, and that is that Bloomberg isn’t going to push his Manhattan plans on Brooklyn without hearing from Brighton Beach, Coney Island and Sheepshead Bay.”

More than 150 people had RSVP’d to attend the scheduled meeting at Coney Island Hospital, where officials from the City Hall-run CIDC planned to show off Bloomberg’s proposal to residents for the first time.

But Kruger was ready. Days before the meeting, he said Bloomberg’s vision was similar to “many failed plans” to revitalize Coney Island considered over the last 50 years and predicted it was “headed for the file cabinet.”

He also raised the central question many are wondering about the mayor’s proposal: How much will it cost to buy out developer Joe Sitt, whose Thor Equities has spent somewhere between $100 and $200 million to buy land in Coney’s amusement zone — land that the mayor now wants to buy, rezone as parkland, and have an outside theme park operator develop as an all-year attraction.

A member of Kruger’s staff boasted that the senator brought almost 500 people from Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay and Gravesend to storm the meeting.

After Coney Island Development Corporation President Lynn Kelly announced that the meeting had been scrubbed, Kruger denied that his goal all along had been to shut it down.

“We brought people from the community to open the meeting up,” Kruger told The Brooklyn Paper. “Not to shut it down.”

Kruger’s “community” included more than a dozen men wearing hats that read, “The Bloomberg Plan: How much $? How long? Who pays.” It is unclear where the men came from or what group they represented.

Kruger suggested that CIDC scheduled the meeting at the hospital to keep the crowd small so they could cherry-pick local residents who were friendly to the mayor’s plan.

“They blocked the first person that came off the elevator that was not one of their people,” Kruger said. “That sends a clear message about whether they were truly planning a public forum.”

But Kelly disagreed: “I’m disappointed that the true members of the community who put their time and effort to come and listen to us who didn’t get to because busloads of unknown people showed up unexpected­ly,” she said, adding that the decision to cancel and reschedule the meeting was a judgment call made by her organization based on recommendations from the police and fire departments and hospital officials.

Eliot Wofse, who lives in the area and once worked on the amusements at Coney Island, was one of the people who lost his chance to discuss the plan. He said he had been invited to the meeting by CIDC, but added that he was not friendly to the Bloomberg proposal.

“People aren’t happy with the Bloomberg plan because it was sprung on the community,” Wofse said.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

ANn from Sheepshead Bay says:
The ONLY reason Kruger is involved is he isn't making money off of this. Look at what he did in Sheepshead Bay, he took money from developers and stalled and stalled and didn't stand up for the Bay until his connections were uncovered at a CB meeting. By then, it was too late. Kruger is an opportunist, and he missed this opportunity for money so is using it as an opportunity for good press.
Dec. 12, 2007, 10:43 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.