Sections

Oil spill fix moves slickly

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Energy giant ExxonMobil will double the amount of toxic sludge it is currently pumping out of the ground underneath Greenpoint by the end of the year, the company announced on Wednesday.

Andrew Warrell, the company’s global remediation manager, said ExxonMobil will add 10 pumps to the 11 it is already operating as a part of its effort to clean up the estimated 30 million gallons of oil that slowly leaked into the ground from numerous oil refineries over the course of a century.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency once estimated that it would take another 30 years to finish the cleanup, but Warrell told reporters that “there’s no basis for those estimates.”

He added that his company has already recovered 9.5 million gallons and spent $50 million — and is currently pumping the oil out at the rate of about 1,000 gallons a day. That number could double when the company starts running the additional pumps, which it has already dug wells for, in the next six weeks.

The recovered oil is given to BP, another petrol giant, in exchange for use of its distribution terminal on the site. BP sells that oil, but Warrell said he doubts the company makes a profit on it.

The Coast Guard discovered the plume in Newtown Creek during a routine patrol in 1978 and later estimated the size of the spill to be 17 million gallons. An EPA report in September nearly doubled that number.

The plume, which is three times larger than the spill created by Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989, sits under 55 acres of Greenpoint. In February, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sued ExxonMobil for dragging its feet on the cleanup, which was ordered by the state in 1990.

Warrell dismissed that idea — and also poo-pooed the lawsuits filed by Greenpoint residents who are suing for monetary damages, alleging that the plume has caused health problems and diminished their property values.

“We think those cases are totally without merit,” Warrell said.

A report by the state Department of Environmental Conservation seemed to concur, saying that there is no evidence of either oil or dangerous vapors seeping up into people’s homes.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Ethan says:
“We think those cases are totally without merit,”....... And yet they didn't think accelerating the clean-up process was warranted either until it was demanded of them. Basically, Exxon, we don't give a damn what you think. Clean up your damn oil mess and we'll see you in court.
Nov. 16, 2007, 1:29 am
Michael Heimbinder says:
Adam, thanks for the update on the status of Greenpoint Oil Spill remediation process. I would like to make one important correction, however. You state that the Department of Environmental Conservation found "no evidence of either oil or dangerous vapors seeping up into people’s homes." Unfortunately this is not the case. It is true that the DEC vapor intrusion study did not find hazardous vapors in people's homes associated with the oil spill (e.g. benzene & methane). However, they did find hazardous vapors in 8 out of the 52 homes tested, that's 15% of the homes. In 6 of these homes they found elevated levels of chlorinated solvents, such as perchloroethylene, and in 2 of the homes DEC found such a laundry list of hazardous vapors that they did not even bother listing them in their oral report to the community. If you would like more information regarding these findings you can contact me at mheimbinder(at)habitatmap.org or visit the DEC at http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/38605.html
Nov. 16, 2007, 12:03 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.