Today’s news:

Greenpoint tells Exxon: Suck it up!

The Brooklyn Paper

Greenpointers skeptical about a claim by ExxonMobil that its cleanup of the massive underground oil spill under Greenpoint will speed up later this year are demanding an outside consultant be hired to make sure the oil giant keeps its promises.

Exxon showed off its progress at a community meeting last Thursday at the St. Stanislaus Kostka School on Newell Street that featured a fancy slide show and a promise to double the number of pumps it is currently operating in the area around the Newtown Creek.

But Bob McEarlean, a Hausman Street resident, was among many who said the oil company’s assurance that it was working as fast as it could was “a load of bull.”

“Youse guys should have stepped up a long time ago,” McEarlean said. “I don’t trust this.”

Other residents questioned why it will take two more decades — on top of the 17 years so far — to finish cleaning the 30-million-gallon spill.

But ExxonMobil said it is using “the most efficient” technology available, according to Donald L. Clarke, a company official.

“If better technology comes along, that is more efficient, I promise you that we will use it and we will be here until the job is done,” Clarke said. Area residents say there is no way for them to know if Exxon is telling the truth.

“We as a community lack the expertise to understand what technologies are ‘state-of-the-art,’” said Christine Holowacz. “So I suggest that ExxonMobil pay for an independent consultant … so that we can be assured that you really are doing all that you can.”

The plume, which is three times larger than the Exxon Valdez disaster, is the result of slow leaks from the many oil refineries that lined Newtown Creek in the late-19th and 20th Centuries. It was discovered almost 30 years ago and, in 1990, the state ordered ExxonMobil to clean it up. Since then, the company has spent $50 million and recovered 9.5 million gallons, according to Exxon officials.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links