All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

Wave goodbye to ‘park’ walkways

The Brooklyn Paper

A key — and much-hyped — design element of the proposed Brooklyn Bridge Park development that would have created Boardwalk-like promenades over the East River has been quietly abandoned by state officials who deemed it harmful to aquatic life.

The loss of one the most-prominent features of the open-space and condo development is the latest setback for the beleaguered project.

“These walkways were the most innovative and exciting design elements of the park plan because they allowed people access down to — and into — the water,” said Marianna Koval, executive director of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy, the non-profit group that schedules events and activities along the waterfront.

Besides the aesthetic appeal, the bridges would have made the park more pedestrian friendly. It provided links between three of the six piers that comprise Brooklyn Bridge Park, allowing park users to stroll from one pier to the next without having to go all the way back to dry land.

Koval said her group would appeal to state Department of Environmental Conservation to reconsider the decision, which was made earlier this year, but revealed to the public at a presentation on Tuesday night about the 85-acres of greenspace, condos, shops and hotel rooms that make up the “park.”

Also at Tuesday night’s meeting, at NYU-Polytechnic University, Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation President Regina Myer dismissed reports that the one of the first elements of the park — a grand plaza, greenmarket and skating rink under the Brooklyn Bridge — that was scheduled to open next year had been delayed by five years because the city Department of Transportation needs the land to repair the span.

“We are proceeding with the construction plans,” said Myer. “It includes all of the Brooklyn Bridge Plaza.” But moments later, outside the earshot of the 75 people at the meeting, Myer admitted to The Brooklyn Paper that the land squabble with the DOT had not been resolved.

The Brooklyn Bridge Park development has been fraught with, controversy, soaring costs and delays since its conception over 20 years ago. The 1.3-mile strip was scheduled to be fully built by 2012 with $150 million allocated by then-Gov. Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg in 2002.

Costs have more than doubled and a new official estimate has been promised for this fall. Taxpayer funds have not kept up with overruns either. There’s enough money to finish only 66 percent of the park’s construction in the next four to six years, Myer said.

The park’s maintenance is another flashpoint. By mandate, the development must generate revenue to cover its annual expenses — estimated to be $15 million in 2002. The planners ignited a firestorm with open space purists when they chose to include 1,400 units of luxury housing and a hotel inside the park’s footprint. Residents and hotels guests would pay fees to the park to cover operating costs instead of general taxes.

Reader Feedback

Ace from New Utrecht says:
"park" is right. How about we get rid of all the asphalt and plant some grass, imagine a simple walkway like we have along the water in Bensonhurst and Bay Ridge.
Oct. 10, 2008, 2:05 pm
anon says:
Mariana- the ultimate elitist wants elite ammenities. we need fields for sports, tennis courts, a swimming pool etc. we do not need a park for the elite she represents and fund raises among we need a park for the people.
Oct. 10, 2008, 3:13 pm
cobble hill denizen from cobble hill says:
In Regina's slick presentation, she slipped into her presentation the fact that the park is now only a total of 50 acres, not 85 acres as claimed. The proposed walkways would have enclosed water "acreage" and thus allowed the Develo-Parkers to claim that the non-park uses (housing, roadways, concessions, etc) are a smaller percentage of the total.

So, now that BBP is to be only 50 acres, what will the Develo-Parkers cut out? And how will they raise the $15 million they claim they need to "maintain" the "park" now that the condo housing market has tanked?
Oct. 10, 2008, 9:34 pm
Jen from dumbo says:
they are gross people behind this "park"

wait till we see what actually gets done, after the sham plans are jettisoned

though with the economy tanking, the condos might not get done even
Oct. 16, 2008, 10:28 am
Mary the Librarian says:
Any truth to the rumors that much of the money allocated so far has been used to drive piles for the luxury housing??
Nov. 8, 2008, 7:29 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links