Sections

Idle talk! Deal to power down cruise ships sinks

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

A plan to reduce the air pollution being belched by cruise liners at the Red Hook ship terminal fell apart in a jurisdictional dispute that has left locals literally gasping for air.

A solution to the nuisance of smoke-spewing cruise ships looked imminent in January, when the Port Authority pledged to spend $1.5 million on electrical infrastructure, and Carnival Cruise lines promised to retrofit its Brooklyn fleet.

The missing piece, the Port Authority and city claimed, was discounted electricity from Con Edison, because the standard rate for the juice is too high to justify turning off the diesel engines in favor of plugging in.

But the state Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities, nixed the so-called “shore power” idea on jurisdictional grounds in April, telling the Port Authority and the city to negotiate instead with the New York Power Authority, the port agency’s main supplier of electricity.

Locals’ hopes were dashed.

“The residents of Red Hook are bearing the brunt once again,” said Adam Armstrong, who lives on Pioneer Street and has made “cold ironing” a personal crusade.

State documents, citing federal environmental standards, depict the seafaring ships and their fossil-fuel-burning generators as an easily eliminated health hazard.

“New York City’s air quality is among the worst in the nation and port-related air emissions are meaningful and avoidable,” the Public Service Commission decision said.

It was unclear why the Port Authority and the city had appealed to Con Edison, but a spokesman for the Port Authority now says that the agency is in negotiations with the New York Power Authority.

For Armstrong, the highly charged issue surged with renewed importance last week when the Port Authority extended the lease of the cruise terminal from 2019 to 2029. It also raised his environmental hackles when it gave the city a new lease through 2029 for nearby Pier 11, where the beer importer Phoenix Beverages is relocating its operations, suggesting that more ship and truck traffic are headed for the neighborhood.

“It’s shocking that they’re doing this so swiftly when it’s clear from the evidence that the pollution from the cruise terminal is going to have an impact on the people here,” Armstrong fumed.

The snafu is an embarrassment for the Bloomberg Administration and the Port Authority, which had engineered the proposal to get docked ships to turn off the diesel and, instead, plug into the mainland power grid.

It’s an even stronger disappointment for landlubbers who are breathing the air.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Christopher M. from Fort Hamiliton says:
Red Hook is evolving into just another neighborhood infested with wanna-be Bohemian malcontents.
June 3, 2009, 11:04 am
Charles from Brooklyn says:
Yeh, malcontent about air pollution (above). Jerk.

This is just another example of interests outside New York taking the benefits of the city at the expense of city residents. The middle class in NYC are being used, abused, and literally, choked to death. Turn off the god damn engines!
June 3, 2009, 11:16 am
Nancy D from Columbia Waterfront says:
BP- Thanks for finally publishing a piece on this. The residents of Red Hook always come last when $$ is involved.

If this was happening in another neighborhood people would be going crazy. The truth is there are just not enough votes in RH to get the elected's to listen.

What is CM Sara Gonzalez's position on this and is she speaking up for the community??
June 3, 2009, 1:28 pm
Charlie from Carroll Gardens says:
I have one simple question. If it's all about air quality, why aren't activists upset with DOE plans to shut down the local zoned public school and replace with a citywide charter school since scenario will generate 75 additional diesel bus trips (not to mention automobiles) daily? From an air quality perspective, this will have similar environmental impacts yet there's nary from the community about it.
June 3, 2009, 2:44 pm
Iris from Williamsburg says:
If this is environmental racism, why not reach out to Majora Carter?
June 3, 2009, 3:22 pm
gchoas20 from redhook says:
The cruise ships need to be in Manhattan,N.Y. Passenger ship terminal.E.D.C. of N.Y.C. Kate Ascher forced the cruise ships to go to Brooklyn.
June 8, 2009, 10:58 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

This week’s featured advertisers