In the 35th District: Letitia James steamrolls Yards-loving foe

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Letitia James* 7,479 (81.2 percent)
Delia Hunley-Adossa 1,275 (13.9 percent)

Medhanie Estiphanos 460 (5 percent)

35th Council District covering Fort Greene and Clinton Hill

The popular incumbent James fended off a challenge from Hunley-Adossa that turned out to be mostly a financial one. Backed by construction union workers thanks to her support for the Atlantic Yards mega-project, Hunley-Adossa was able to raise more money than the incumbent — a rarety in New York.

But her inaccessability, plus her poor performance in a Community Newspaper Group-sponsored debate, hurt her ability to capitalize on her funding.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

happyleader from Manhattan says:
Congratulations to Ms. James! The ONLY one with the courage to stand up and oppose two disgraces: Term Limits and Atlantic Yards. Maybe, finally, the voters are recognizing who truly represents them.
Sept. 16, 2009, 3:13 am
Sound Girl from Prospect Heights says:
Ms James deserved this win. Ms. Hundley and her entire campain colglomerates were repulsivley rude, and disrespectful. I am so glad COUNCILWOMAN Letitia James beat her opposition, they had it coming one way or another.
Sept. 16, 2009, 9:23 am
Paul from Park Slope says:
DHA had absolutely NOTHING going for her except union and construction money! She shouldn't even have been on the ballot since she's contractually obligated to represent Ratner's interests first. Even lobbyists have to break with their clients before running, but not this bad joke!

Good for Tish, and for us!
Sept. 16, 2009, 9:37 am
Alphonso from Adelphi Street says:
Spot on re term limits. Rabid anti-ratnerism, not so much.
Sept. 16, 2009, 12:39 pm
sam from downtown says:
opposing AY is not "rabid-anti-ratnerism"
Sept. 17, 2009, 12:36 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.