All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

‘Park’ costs go up again!

The Brooklyn Paper

The cost to construct — and operate — the troubled Brooklyn Bridge Park development has gone up again, but its planners say that the higher maintenance cost is actually a cut!

The price tag for the 1.3-mile strip of waterfront housing and open space along the Brooklyn Heights and DUMBO waterfront is now $347 million — up from an original budget of $150 million in 2002. And the cost for annual upkeep inched to $16.1 million, up from a projected $15.2 million, according to sources briefed after a meeting on Monday of the project’s planners.

But the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation quickly denied that the upkeep costs have risen.

“They have not gone up,” spokeswoman Lisa Willner said via e-mail. In fact, she said the costs are actually going down: “Taking inflation into account, the $15.2 million … is equal to $17.2 million in 2008 dollars.”

She did not comment on the soaring construction costs of the development.

The new figures come to light just as development officials were forced to admit that their principal sources of revenue for maintenance — a hotel and roughly 800 units of luxury housing inside the park’s footprint — had been postponed.

Additionally, the “park” now consists only of passive recreation areas at Pier 1 at the foot of Old Fulton Street and Pier 6 at the foot of Atlantic Avenue. Officials vow that those areas will be finished by the end of the year.

On the eve of a public hearing set for Thursday night, reaction to the new cost and maintenance figures was muted, even from one of the park project’s critics, state Sen. Daniel Squadron (D–Carroll Gardens).

“I absolutely have concerns about these numbers, but this is the moment to get them out and into the hands of the community,” the first-term lawmaker said.

The Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, the state agency building the lawns, playgrounds and playing fields on piers and uplands, has strictly guarded the park’s finances since revealing last May that the price had topped $300 million.

“I hope this is the beginning of continued transparency and openness,” Squadron said.

The project’s finances are steeped in controversy because of the unusual arrangement that permits luxury housing and a hotel inside the “park” as a way of generating revenue for maintenance of the grounds.

The private elements — 1,210 apartments and a 225-bed hotel, plus retail space — are supposed to contribute fees to cover the parkland’s yearly budget instead of paying normal taxes.

That revenue stream is dry except for 449 apartments that are already built at One Brooklyn Bridge Park, a former Jehovah’s Witness complex on Furman Street. State officials say that the building will contribute $3 million annually — “which will help us to maintain the park for several years.”

Reader Feedback

Publius from Bklyn Hgts says:
Since the proposed hotel at Pier 1 and the two condo towers at Pier 6 are indefinately "on hold", the BBPDC states that the existing 447 luxury condos at 1 BBP (360 Furman) will contribute $5 million which they claim will support the park in the short term.

I hope we'll learn tonight from the BBPDC officials how they expect that $5 million to be paid when after 20 months on the market, as reported by Bloomberg News, 360 Furman is only 1/3 sold (approximately 150 condos out of the 447), and have been selling at a rate of only 2/month for the past few months. Where does the other 2/3 come from? The developer? The developer's funding source (a subsidiary of AIG)?

Looking forward to the "New Transparency". Thank you to our State elected officials for pushing the BBPDC to bring their financials into the sunlight.
Jan. 29, 2009, 10:23 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links