Sections

Historic district expansion: Preservation or gentrification?

Community Newspaper Group
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

An effort to preserve the history of Carroll Gardens is being criticized for actually hastening the neighborhood’s gentrification, said opponents of a controversial city initiative to widen the area’s historic district.

“They just want to re-gentrify and force out whatever elements from the past are left,” said lifelong area resident and businessman John Esposito, who helped form Citizens Against Landmarks to thwart the Landmarks Preservation Commission’s nascent effort to extend historic protections to a larger segment of the brownstone neighborhood.

Esposito and others don’t feel protected — they feel threatened.

The landmarking agency is only in the earliest phase of studying an extension to the existing district, according to spokeswoman Lisi de Bourbon.

But that’s the problem, said resident Mike Cassidy, who said an expanded district will bring an undue burden on homeowners, who would be required to win the approval from Landmarks for every exterior improvement done on their property.

“This viability study worries us,” Cassidy said. “They’ll do the viability study, and then they’ll ram it down our throats.”

Opponents have set up a Web site, carrollgardensresidents.wordpress.com, and hope “to get [Landmarks] to recognize that not everyone is thrilled,” he said.

Currently, the 37-year-old historic district includes 149 buildings in a surprisingly small area bounded by President, Carroll, Smith and Hoyt streets. While the neighborhood was last year rezoned to discourage oversized growth, supporters of the landmarking initiative say it adds a layer of additional protection an area particularly besieged by overdevelopment during the decade’s last building boom.

The agency will examine 50–60 blocks, and insiders expect that about half of that might be deemed viable. The entire process can take years from the viability study to actual creation of the district.

Glenn Kelly, co-chairman of the Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association, favors the expansion.

“There are some who don’t, or can’t see past the negatives — and yes, there are some negatives. It’s a bit more of a hassle when you have to make repairs to the front of your house.”

And Kelly should know — he lives on landmarked Carroll Street.

“Yes, it’s cost me more money, but I want to leave my house better than I found it — and I’m not going to mess it up just to save a few bucks.”

One reason to expand the Carroll Gardens Historic District is that its boundaries do not actually include some of the blocks with wide front gardens that actually give the neighborhood its name, said Bob Furman, founder of the Brooklyn Preservation Council.

“It’s always been a contradiction,” Furman said.

Councilman Brad Lander (D-Park Slope) also supports the landmarking extension.

“I think that landmarks and historic districts can be a good deal for preserving the character of a neighborhood so I’m glad they decided to do a viability study — but one critical element is neighborhood support,” he said.

Lander admitted that historic districts can lead to higher costs, people generally find that it’s not a “significant” burden.

Esposito called Lander’s position “arrogant.”

“His constituents aren’t just the upper class, they’re the people who built this neighborhood,” he said. “They just want to force [us] out.”

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Tainisha from Bed Stuy says:
Mornos, don't they know that the best way to protect a landmark is by having poor people live in it?
March 18, 2010, 11:55 am
thomas lawrence from brooklyn heights says:
Having poor people living in many buildings led to much of the defacing and other atrocities seen here and there, like the invasion of the Tin Men and the Stone Men.

The wide front gardens don't "give" Carroll Gardens its name; the real estate business did that.
March 21, 2010, 6:31 pm
Scarano, Ratner & Toll from Brooklyn says:
That's right, folks, fight the landmarking. We'll be sure to take care of you if you do.

;-)
March 21, 2010, 9:19 pm
BD from REDHOOK/CARROLL GDNS says:
NO NO NO- Real Estate- never made the Carroll Gardens - its name- It was the beautiful gardens and the homeowners along with some residents that put their hands in it to make it look the way it does. Real Estate -dont do nothing to beautify the neighborly gardens- As for S R n Toll- we do not need you to take care of any of Red Hook/Carroll Gardens. We do not need your TOWERING GLASS BUILDINGS- to shade our community and DISTROY our quaint Four Family Homes. WE ARE THE VOICE- THAT REPRESENTS US.
There are many blocks that are involved and majority of these blocks do not have LANDMARK LOOK. Some are carriage homes - some have exterior and interior looks. DOWNZONING IS OUR SAFETY LINK.
March 30, 2010, 10:17 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.