Today’s news:

Suit: ESDC lied to judge about Yards timetable

The Brooklyn Paper

The state development agency leading the Atlantic Yards project got a favorable ruling in a key opposition lawsuit by withholding information about the mega-development’s construction timetable from a judge, a new appeal filed last week charges.

The missing information was contained in a “closing document” signed by the Empire State Development Corporation and developer Bruce Ratner that allows Ratner to take 25 years to finish the project, instead of the 10 years that the lawyers had argued during the suit itself.

That closing document was made public eight days after the case was heard by Judge Marcy Friedman — and project foes now claim that if she’d had all the information, she might have ruled differently.

In fact, Friedman’s ruling, issued in March, hinted as much.

“[I am] constrained to hold that ESDC’s elaboration of its reasons for using the 10-year build-out was supported — albeit, in this court’s opinion, only minimally — by the factors articulated by ESDC,” Friedman wrote.

That “minimal” support was the kernel of today’s appeal.

“It would seem that minimal support erodes entirely due to the facts [that were] subsequently revealed,” said Daniel Goldstein, a spokesman for Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn.

That said, the latest legal case against Ratner’s arena and housing complex slated to rise above a Long Island Rail Road yard in Prospect Heights remains a real long shot, given that several judges, including Friedman, have typically deferred to the ESDC rather than addressing whether the project itself is legally flawed.

“A court is precluded from making substantive judgments on the evidence or evaluat[ing] de novo the data presented to the agency,” Friedman said. “This court may not make any independent findings of fact or any independent determination on the impact of the changes in the plan for the project.”

That said, Development Don’t Destroy legal director Candace Carponter still thinks there’s a shot.

“We think the court will recognize that the ESDC’s argument and therefore the ruling, was egregiously incomplete,” said Candace Carponter, the legal director for Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, an opposition group. “Reconsideration of the case is necessary because of the self-contradicting and revealing information ESDC intentionally held back from the court and the public.”

The reason for the appeal is that opponents believe that a 25-year build-out actually creates the very blight that the state said it would remedy by allowing Ratner to build.

“They have maintained [since 2006] that it is a 10-year project,” Goldstein said. “If that’s not true then there are major issues [that must be considered].”

A spokeswoman for the ESDC disagreed, saying that the appeal “raises arguments that are similar or identical to arguments that already have been rejected by the courts.”

“ESDC will oppose the motion, and we are confident that we will prevail,” said the spokeswoman, Beth Mitchell.

Updated 6:16 pm, April 14, 2010: Story was updated to include a comment from the ESDC.
Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Joey from Clinton Hills says:
Goldstein is back, baby!
April 8, 2010, 5:30 pm
Mike from FG says:
This is pathetic already. You lost get over it.
April 8, 2010, 5:42 pm
Brian from Mill Basin says:
The Nets may have dodged infamy but apparently Goldstein and co. are trying to set a record for most court rulings lost in a row.
April 8, 2010, 6:18 pm
Norman Oder says:
Well, take a look at the documents:
http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2010/04/dddb-allies-aim-to-reopen-case-based-on.html
April 8, 2010, 8:28 pm
Bob from Park Slope says:
Like the Bush administration, the Ratner administration and its cronies appear to believe that the truth doesn't matter when they're trying to achieve their goals.

Go, DDDB!
April 8, 2010, 10:40 pm
Mike from FG says:
every single judge has already ruled in favor of the nets. the nimbys suck and are just wasting everyones time.
April 8, 2010, 11:22 pm
John from Clinton Hill says:
This story gives me narcolepsy.
April 9, 2010, 8:21 am
freddy from slope says:
ahh... the smell of relief from judgement..

misrepresentation or fraud?

which is it?

i may actually go to this hearing as it takes a stab at the obfuscational tactics the quasi-governmental agency ESDC might have engaged in.
April 9, 2010, 9:20 am
Louis from Marine Park says:
"The reason for the appeal is that opponents believe that a 25-year build-out actually creates the very blight that the state said it would remedy by allowing Ratner to build."

Of course Ratner needs a 25 years for Atlantic Yards! He has to schedule construction allowing for all the lawsuits and stop-orders that are certain!

By fighting Atlantic Yards, you make Brooklyn appear hostile to business - at least business in Park Slope. The construction trades - architects, electricians, plumbers - are already moving on from this recession.

Only illegals will be left. They can put up the sheetrock from China for you.
April 9, 2010, 9:56 am
Charles from PS says:
Yes, Louis (Where is Marine Park ... Staten I?), we are hostile to developments that go against principles of fairness and legality. This project is a fraud upon the public and an illegal land grab. Deal with this: The real Brooklyn fights for its rights. Even if we eventually lose in the end, Ratner will not come out a multi-millionare like he thought. We kept our dignity and pride, and in the end, we bled Ratner dry.
April 9, 2010, 1:48 pm
Jason from Brooklyn says:
if they lied about the time table, does that mean that we die-hard net's fans have to wait longer to see our fav team play. Total bumer.

Go net's!
April 9, 2010, 8:35 pm
Jason from Brooklyn says:
if they lied about the time table, does that mean that we die-hard net's fans have to wait longer to see our fav team play. Total bumer.

Go net's!
April 9, 2010, 8:35 pm
Barbara from Clinton Hill says:
Go DDDB!!! Let's see: Russian billionaire per earlier article supports corrupt African country where the US is opposed to abusive practices - so this same public clearly can not support same Russian Billionaire company with US dollars against US foreign policy PLUS evidently ESDC's ongoing attempts to hide time tables and conceal budgets with this same public money. What a mess.
April 12, 2010, 2:42 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links