All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

The MTA’s big bollards are an affront to Brooklyn

The Brooklyn Paper

We were pleased that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority spent $106 million on an attractive new Long Island Rail Road terminal at Atlantic and Flatbush avenues.

But the end result of the project was a slap in the face to all New Yorkers.

There is no question that John di Domenico’s architecture at the new Atlantic Terminal is soaring. The problem with the rail station is the 14, massive granite, tomb-like boxes that ring the Flatbush Avenue entrance — a security perimeter that took a building meant to symbolize the freedom of rail travel and turned it into a fortress.

Make no mistake: We are well aware that the former structure on the site was once seen as a target for suicide bombers, and the new building may attract such extremists again. And, as New Yorkers, we want our public agencies to protect important buildings in a responsible and thoughtful manner.

But the MTA did a bollard bait-and-switch: Renderings from as recently as 2007 showed a line of fewer — and significantly smaller — bollards that would have unobtrusively protected the front of the station.

Those renderings bear as close a resemblance to reality as “Inglourious Basterds” does to a World War II documentary.

Instead, the MTA went for overkill. As The Brooklyn Paper reports on its print edition front page today, the MTA bollards are far taller and far closer together than even the NYPD recommends for the highest-risk targets in the city.

That’s bad enough, but the final fortress-like design was conceived without any input from the terminal’s ultimate users, the public. If public agencies can show one set of renderings, then build something completely at odds with the spirit of those renderings, it makes a mockery of urban planning and architecture.

Worse, the same pattern is playing out at the state’s Barclays Center across the street. In this case, the architecture firm SHoP has presented dramatic designs for the basketball arena — renderings that show a line of thin, architecturally reasonable bollards.

But will those renderings be tossed away in a closed-door meeting, just as the original Atlantic Terminal renderings were? We’ve asked the Empire State Development Corporation repeatedly, but the agency won’t answer.

As a result, we’ll likely get stuck with another Flatbush fortress — one that gets sprung on us at the last minute without any prior discussion with, or concern for, the public.

That’s unacceptable.

Reader Feedback

Dave from PS says:
Come on Marty - this is a NO BRAINER get the bollards changed and look like a hero
Jan. 28, 2010, 11:15 am
Steve from Greenpoint says:
Welcome to Stone-Henge-on-Atlantic!
Jan. 29, 2010, 12:26 am
Bloos Ramter from Brooklyn says:
We want it, the stuff. Bollards are the stuff.
Build it for me bwuce.

Brooklyn is it!
Feb. 1, 2010, 3:10 pm
David from fort greene says:
Absolutely awful. What's really weird is that these custom made monstrosities almost certainly involve more time and money than putting in standardized bollards.
Feb. 1, 2010, 4:02 pm
Paul from Sheepshead Bay says:
I had to see this to get a better picture of what they looked like. What they look like is stupid. Quite hideous and I'm glad the MTA finally got some common sense knocked into it.
Aug. 31, 2011, 10:22 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links