Sections

Adams: I did not lie about Aqueduct gaming debacle

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

A once-time rising star in the state Senate is in full damage-control mode after a state investigation questioned his role in the corrupt bidding process over turning Aqueduct race track into a video gaming hall.

State Sen. Eric Adams (D–Park Slope) invited all of Brooklyn’s Democratic district leaders to dial into a rare conference call on Monday afternoon so he could give his side of the story to the political insiders who would play a supporting role in Adams’s quest for higher office.

“The real question is … can he stop the bleeding,” said one insider who was on the call, where Adams disputed a State Inspector General finding that he gave “incredible” testimony to state investigators over the legislature’s selection of the Aqueduct Entertainment Group to run the new video slot machines at the Ozone Park racetrack.

Adams delivered a point-by-point rebuttal of the report’s findings — zeroing in on inconsistencies between his version and the inspector’s version of the timeline of events, specifically saying that Inspector General Joseph Fisch “mixed up” two dinners that Adams had with Gov. Paterson, including one in January, 2009, when the Aqueduct bid was decided upon.

But Adams asserted that he barely discussed anything at that dinner and that he had indicated his choice to Paterson at another dinner months earlier.

Adams declined to comment further, saying his attorneys told him not to speak publicly about the case, but confirmed he would be sending out a mailer to constituents next month with a formal statement on the report.

The state inspector’s findings have been turned over to Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who is investigating.

Some public officials have already started distancing themselves from Adams and his colleagues embroiled in the Aqueduct investigation.

Attorney General-elect Eric Schneiderman returned contributions of $10,500 to Adams, in addition to refunding $55,900 in donations from state Sen. John Sampson’s committee two weeks before the November election.

A Schneiderman spokesman told the Daily News that he was merely keeping his promise to refund any money that had been tainted by the Aqueduct scandal.

Updated 3:00 pm, December 7, 2010: Includes additional information about campaign contributions.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Ace from New Utrecht says:
What shame, he did seem like a concerned politician. His emails are very informative and helpful. I would not have gotten work with the census without the heads up from his office. His pants billboards are terrific too. In the end they are all the same. Follow the money.
Dec. 7, 2010, 12:06 pm
Joey from Clinton Hills says:
say goodbye!
Dec. 7, 2010, 3:42 pm
Dean from Park Slope says:
The LGBT community and progressives everywhere thank Eric Adams for helping lose the Senate and same sex marriage.

Did he not know Carl Andrews was bad news?
Dec. 8, 2010, 4:01 pm
old timer says:
Maybe Adams need to get a GO-15! (inside joke)
Dec. 8, 2010, 8:05 pm
Priscilla from Windsor Terrace says:
Hello Eric did you not know that Carl Andrews was the crooked Clarence Norman's "bag man" for all of Norman's time as County Leader?

I guess those campaign contributions were just so enticing to you and the clowns who work for you to pass up. Enjoy being State Senator it's the last elected office you likely to ever hold.
Dec. 8, 2010, 8:43 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.