Today’s news:

A big Domi-NO from CB1 panel

The Brooklyn Paper

The Community Board 1 Land Use Committee voted against the $1.2-billion redevelopment of the old Domino Sugar factory on Tuesday night, the first public rejection of the project as it enters the eight-month review process for a rezoning along the Williamsburg waterfront that would allow a multiple-skyscraper project that is larger than the law currently allows.

The 5-3 vote is merely a suggestion to the full community board, whose vote on March 9 is itself merely advisory to Borough President Markowitz, the City Planning Commission and the City Council, all of which have a say on the proposal.

But the rejection was a stumble for the Community Preservation Corporation, which seeks to rezone the old refinery site from manufacturing to residential in order to build a 2,200-unit waterfront complex with multiple skyscrapers.

In exchange, the developers promise publicly accessible waterfront open space and a far higher-than-required rate of affordable housing.

But even that affordable housing became a source of controversy, as board members complained that CPC has only committed to maintaining the below-market-rate rents for 15 years at the site. Other panelists complained that there is limited public transportation to the area, whose population is expected to boom.

“The bottom line is, we need proof that this is really needed,” said committee Chairman Ward Dennis. “We’re all for affordable housing, but we want permanent affordability — it’s a must for something we’ll sign off on.”

CPC executives said that the company is adamant about its offer of an unusually high 30-percent below-market-rate housing, or 660 units, but no official commitments were made to the permanence of those units.

Others attacked the transparency of the project, maintaining that too many questions have been left unanswered. CPC representatives did say that they are willing to change their heavily subsidized, six-phase project if the system of housing and retail space in the first site — the refinery’s former parking lot on Kent Avenue between South Third and South Fourth streets — doesn’t work as planned.

“The density of this project is required in order to make the entire program work,” said Susan Pollock, senior vice president of the development company, which bought the site just north of the Williamsburg Bridge in 2004 after Domino shut down operations.

“The [parking lot] site is so dense because we chose not to build on the [four acres] of open, public space that this community needs.”

But the developer’s promises to work on concerns didn’t faze the committee, which spent nearly three hours discussing changes that it wants — changes that would buffer the neighborhood’s ability to absorb the influx of people and transportation to the area.

The panel’s rejection will move to the full community board on March 9, and then to Markowitz, who will hold his own public hearing. It’s unclear whether those entities will echo the committee’s apparent disdain for the project.

It is typical in large land-use projects for local community boards to object on specific, parochial issues such as transportation or density, only to have those issues be ignored by the larger jurisdictions that have different interests.

One potential “adverse impact” of the new Domino not mentioned at the meeting — but outlined in the project’s Environmental Impact Statement — will fall on schools within a half mile of the site.

Two public schools — an elementary school and a middle school, both on North Fifth Street — are near or above capacity already, and the impact statement notes that these and other schools would see an influx of new students if the Domino plant is fully built out.

The CPC offers several solutions, mostly pertaining to changes within the school district: shift the catchment areas within the school district, move students to schools with available capacity, create new satellite facilities in other schools or construct new schools all together.

In the end, the members of the land-use committee who voted against the Domino project expressed frustration at the hearing, which took place at the Capital One Bank building in Greenpoint.

“We should just shoot ourselves right now,” said board member Heather Roslund, an opponent. “If this is the future of New York City, it’s just sad.”

The full Community Board 1 will take up the debate at its next meeting on March 9 at 6:30 pm at the Swinging Sixties Senior Citizens Center [211 Ainslie St. at Manhattan Avenue in Williamsburg, (718) 389-0009].

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Hunter from Bed Stuy says:
the L train sounds like it's going to explode with the massive influx of new residents. Are the new residents going to be biking across the bridge? I doubt it.
Feb. 24, 2010, 10:02 am
Max from Williamsburg says:
What good is housing of any income level without jobs. Williamsburg's vacancy rate for "luxury" housing is the benchmark for NYC: http://nymag.com/realestate/features/57904/
In other words, "The New Domino" plan seems a little loopy.

What we need are Job AND Affordable Housing. They are not mutually exclusive. Giant luxury Mega-Projects do not = affordable housing. The Alternate Plan or what is called the "NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE" in the Environmental Impact Statement is to "legally" tear down everything possible and put in one story warehouses. Really, that is the only alternative?!

How about Jobs and Affordable housing. Lets think "Out of the Box" like other people have, in this country and all over the world: http://www.dominosugar.org/
Feb. 24, 2010, 10:55 am
William from Williamsburg says:
I was at the "community" meeting last night. What I don't understand was why there was no opportunity for actual community members to be heard. Wasn't that the point? Why won't the developers answer our questions? Or better put: Why won't the developers let us ASK questions?

- William
Feb. 24, 2010, 11:10 am
Alehandro from Williamsburg says:
"Community Preservation Corporation" - LOL That's a great name! Should we start calling a gang of bank robbers "Capital Acquisition Corporation"

It's so cool how you can re-brand something with just a new title.
Feb. 24, 2010, 11:21 am
Willie from Wonka says:
Hope this development doesn't end up looking like Starrett City (or whatever it calls itself today). I suspect so, becasue after all the ranting,blocking,and self-righteousness support for "affordable housing," Brooklyn loves frumpy and mundane architeture.
Feb. 24, 2010, 1:44 pm
ms nomer from greenpoint says:
To William: Last night's meeting was a committee meeting. Like all board related meetings, these are open to the public for transparency reasons, but they're working meetings and the dialogue is between committee members and whatever businesspeople are there to pitch their projects that month. The place to speak up as a member of the public is at the community board meetings, which happen monthly. (And the board meetings are well covered by media, which doubles the value of showing up.) People have been making statements to the board about Domino for years already at board meetings, and should keep doing so, especially at the March 9 meeting. Check www.cb1brooklyn.org for location and make sure you arrive by 6:15pm to sign up to speak!
Feb. 24, 2010, 5:06 pm
Charles from BK says:
Sounds like just another bait-and-switch development project waiting to happen. (Promise a lot up front and then break these promises when the project is approved and funded by tax subsidies. Rezone away another great neighborhood to outside corporate development whose regard for the good of the community is probably non-existent.
Feb. 25, 2010, 11:53 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links