All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

Borough president — though not ours! — says he’ll return tainted developer’s cash

The Brooklyn Paper

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer will return campaign cash from a disgraced developer — something his Brooklyn counterpart has refused to do.

Unlike Borough President Markowitz, Stringer will say fuggedaboutit to cash from Aaron Malinsky, who was arrested earlier this month in a federal probe into bribing a prominent southern Brooklyn state senator.

“The borough president is returning contributions in light of the federal indictment, and will be donating those funds to charity,” said Stringer spokeswoman Audrey Gelman.

The yet-to-be-specified charity can thank us for the coming donation.

The reason? We reported on our website on Wednesday — and in this week’s print editions — that Markowitz had refused to follow other politicians’ leads and return money from Malinsky, his family and other employees at PA Associates, the now-disgraced development firm implicated in the Carl Kruger bribery scandal.

After that story went viral, further investigation revealed that Stringer and his Bronx counterpart Ruben Diaz — had also been recipients of Malinsky’s munificence: Stringer accepted $31,950 in legal campaign contributions from Malinsky and his unindicted family members and business associates since 2004, and Diaz took in $14,850 since 2009.

Neither Diaz nor Stringer had initially announced any intention of returning the cash. But after we called, Stringer reconsidered — putting more heat on Markowitz, who reiterated that he’s keeping the cash, for now.

“If [Malinsky] is found guilty, the borough president will give the money to charity,” the Beep’s spokesman said late on Thursday.

Earlier this week, Markowitz said he would instead wait for the outcome of the criminal case, which alleges that Malinsky was one of eight people charged with funneling bribes to Kruger, a Markowitz ally, who in turn supported the developer’s projects in Mill Basin and Canarsie.

Malinsky, his relatives, and P/A partner Paul Slayton contributed $21,550 to Markowitz, according to the Campaign Finance Board.

Stringer joins Sens. Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand who said last week they would be returning the $250 that each received from Malinsky last August, and donating it to “worthwhile causes.”

New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez said he too plans to donate to charity $10,500 of the $33,000 in campaign donations he’s received from Malinsky.

Markowitz’s refusal to return the money raised some eyebrows in campaign finance quarters, given that he once pleaded guilty to election fraud in his 1985 race for borough president.

In that 1988 case, Markowitz admitted that he had laundered $25,000 through his personal bank account to disguise contributions from the Hyfin Credit Union, whose treasurer was later convicted of stealing from the credit union.

Markowitz avoided jail — but the appearance of impropriety even two decades ago suggested to some that he needs to go above and beyond today.

“He needs to be very proactive to show that he’s learned from his mistakes,” said Susan Lerner of Common Cause New York.

Reader Feedback

jerry from brighton beach says:
Perhaps BP Marty Markowitz is thinking ahead of the curve. He may need these contributions from alleged corrupted developer Malinsky for Marty's future legal defense fund.
You never know what the FBI has on tape these days. Perhaps Marty was caught on tape talking with either Kruger or Malinsky on those projects that are now being questioned.

Who knows ? Only time will tell.
March 25, 2011, 8:43 am
tony from park slope says:
Please, let them have enough evidence to at least force him out of office and silence this windbag forever.
March 25, 2011, 9:40 am
S from PPW says:
Sleazebucket. Please resign before someone charges you with something.
March 25, 2011, 9:43 am
Dave from Park Slope says:
Thank you, NY City Council, for granting us a third term of this.
March 25, 2011, 9:46 am
Bob from Park Slope says:
There's an old adage about tainted money received for good causes that says: "'Taint enough!"

Remember the Gambino family's donation to a hospital out on Long Island that built a bone marrow transplant unit?
March 25, 2011, 4:29 pm
al pankin from downtown says:
marty....keep the money
March 25, 2011, 5:38 pm
Doug Biviano from Brooklyn says:
Give it to public schools Scotty! Thank you.

You too Marty.
March 25, 2011, 6:19 pm
Doug Biviano from Brooklyn says:
Here's a pipeline to PTA Online Contributing:

http://bivforbrooklyn.com/schools
March 25, 2011, 6:21 pm
Kalahari Dessert from Brooklyn says:
He should invest it with his photo-op partner, vodka-promoting, Brooklyn emigrant buddy Spike Lee to make a next movie about how oppressed the poor are.
March 26, 2011, 2:44 pm
Steve Nitwitt from Sheepshead Bay says:
I heard there was a Norm from Atlantic Yards Report sighting on the unemployment line. He swore he thought it was for EB-5.
March 27, 2011, 2:50 am
marcus from dumbo says:
i don't understand why you would give the money "back " when there is just an indictment...a monkey could be indicted...what happened to innocent until proven guilty.
April 20, 2011, 2:57 pm
Steve Nitwitt's conscience says:
Sorry about that. The Brooklyn Paper lets me sound like a jerk.
July 16, 2011, 7:45 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links