Sections

Newtown Creek bubbles

City wants to blow bubbles in Newtown Creek; Environmentalists say plan stinks

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

The city wants to blow bubbles into Newtown Creek in an effort to clean the polluted waterway, but activists fear the plan will dispense foul sewage fumes into the air.

Department of Environmental Protection officials are trying to install a new $115-million aeration system that will pump oxygen into the Greenpoint sludgeway so the creek can meet state and federal water quality standards.

But neighbors and environmental advocates say the plan is only a band-aid solution designed to please bureaucratic bean counters rather than solve Newtown Creek’s problems, which include an antiquated sewer system that floods the canal with raw sewage during heavy rains and 150 years of chemical seepage so severe the viaduct needs a federal cleanup.

Worse, they fear noxious bubbles could become a public health risk if they churn organic waste to the surface.

“It’s a very narrow solution to a very big problem that’s just addressing current standards for dissolved oxygen,” said Phil Musegaas, lead investigator of Riverkeeper, an environmental watchdog group that wrote a scathing letter to the city earlier this month. “It’s not improving ecology of the creek at all.”

A city spokesman said the bubble plan would not pollute the air or put nearby businesses and residents at risk, citing a 2007 study indicating that air emissions at sewage plants do not cause health problems for workers

“For the past 75 years, our wastewater treatment plants have been aerating raw sewage at significantly higher levels than what is performed at Newtown Creek,” said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Corey Chambliss. “We’ve had no documented health issues from employees working at these sites.”

But Musegaas says the city’s data is moot because it is limited to highly regulated plant facilities — not the great outdoors.

“If you install an aeration system in Newtown Creek it’s not in a controlled area, it’s in a public waterway used by recreational kayakers and tug boat operators,” said Musegaas, who points to a separate study showing that pathogenic bacteria and endotoxins can become airborne when bubbles rise through the water. “It’s a very different scenario.”

The city will need state approval before it installs the air pipe, which is part of an agreement between City Hall and Albany to improve water quality and reduce sewage overflow on Newtown Creek by 2017.

Workers already installed a pilot version of the aeration pipes two years ago at the end of Newtown Creek in English Kills, near several sewer drains and the Metropolitan Avenue bridge.

City officials hope to expand the aeration system across the entire creek by 2015.

Environmentalists, who regularly test the coffee-colored creek for bacteria levels, claim the strong sewage scent that arises from the bubbling made them sick.

Musegaas wants the city to launch its own study of aeration on the creek before going forward with its plan.

Greenpoint resident Laura Hofmann questioned the city’s commitment to actually cleaning the waterway while continuing to allow over a billions of stormwater and human waste continue to drain into the creek after rains.

“What good is having a bubble system in the river if they’re going to continue to pour raw sewage into it?” she said. “And if you have a power outage, any fish in that end of the creek will die right away.”

Reach reporter Aaron Short at ashort@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-2547.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.