Sections

Close zoning loopholes!

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Bloomberg certainly heard plenty of complaints about the 2005 rezoning that unleashed the wave of high-rise development on the neighborhood.

Foremost on many residents’ minds was tall towers going up in areas now zoned for smaller buildings, and the loopholes that allow them to rise. There was at least one reference to the so-called “Finger Building,” which many Billyburgers see as being an example of that problem (see story on page 3).

When the touchy subject of downzoning came up, Bloomberg knew what to do: He turned to his Planning Commissioner, Amanda Burden, who said her department is studying the area to identify loopholes.

Some of the 2005 zoning modifications were put in place to limit the height and density of new construction along Brooklyn’s northern waterfront, but the city revisited the issue after some residents noticed that the change on paper wasn’t matching up with the changes to their skyline, Burden said.

Burden promised changes so that there would be “no more finger buildings” and “no more community facility bonuses” — another loophole that allowed developers to build taller if they included space that would benefit the general public, she said.

In the past, developers have gotten permission to build taller by simply renting the ground-floor space to a doctor — a “public benefit,” but not what the law intended.

Burden also said the city would put the brakes on the use of air rights by developers who want to build projects that are out of context with the surrounding area.

Burden promised that the changes would also offer “more opportunities for (affordable) housing.”

For the most part, the crowd at Polonaise Terrace was pleased. But not everyone in north Brooklyn buys it.

“Their assurances that the downzoning is iron clad, written in stone and can’t be undermined is a lie,” said Williamsburg housing activist Phil DePaolo.

DePaolo, who pushed the planning department hard to get the area downzoned in the first place, has been leading the charge against the “finger building” and other developments in the area that he says don’t comply with the new zoning rules.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!