Toll plan has merit

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

The battle for the soul of the Gowanus Canal begins on Thursday night. That’s when a local community board will kick off the rigorous public review process for a proposal by Toll Brothers to build a 447-unit mixed-income residential, commercial and open space project between Carroll and Second streets along the banks of the fetid waterway.

The usual anti-development types are already lining up against the Toll Brothers plan — but we think the opposition is misguided.

Yes, this newspaper has occasionally opposed developers — the name Bruce Ratner comes to mind — who skirt the city’s normal public review process and demand massive public subsidies to ensure tremendous profit.

But Toll Brothers, which needs a city zoning change to realize its vision, is going about it the right way.

First and foremost, the company will go through the city’s “uniform land-use review procedure,” which is an eight- to 12-month analysis that gives many different jurisdictions — the community board, the borough president, the City Planning Commission, the City Council and the mayor — plenty of time and staff expertise to fully vet the proposal.

Also important, the developers are not asking taxpayers to underwrite an oversized project. Yes, taxpayer money would be sought so that 30 percent of the units can be set aside for below-market-rate tenants, but Toll Brothers is not seeking eminent domain or the kind of oversized subsidies and taxpayer-financed “infrastruc­ture” improvements that others have gotten.

Additionally, the project involves substantial risk to the developers, who would be responsible for convincing prospective tenants to live alongside the Gowanus Canal, a toxin- and sewage-filled corpse of water that has been left to molder by city, state and federal authorities — and property owners.

They won’t try to do it only through glossy fliers, but through hard work and costly environmental mitigations.

That would be a refreshing change.

For decades, there has been talk of cleaning up the waterway, but talk — and government — has been cheap. Truly cleaning the canal requires fixing an antiquated sewer system so that raw sewage no longer cascades into the canal during heavy rainfall. The federal government has shown little concern, saying this year that it would be satisfied if the canal water was merely clean enough for fish to propagate.

That ruling was fine for lower aquatic life, but it basically sold us humans down the river.

We have long held that the only way to create a community that’s actually invested in the health of the canal is to have people live there. Otherwise, there’s no pressure on elected officials to do anything, no constituency to which the pols have to answer.

If there are hidden flaws in the Toll Brothers’ draft environmental impact statement, Thursday’s hearing will start the process of exposing them.

But it will also reveal how important this project is for the soul of the Gowanus Canal.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Jim Vogel from Park Slope says:
There's a flaw in the logic that having people near the Canal will cause a cleanup to magically happen, and it's basic earth science. It isn't just the water that is polluted: the ground surrounding the canal is toxic for over a hundred yards on either side as a result of over a century of leaching. For the Toll Brothers to build they will likely do as minimal an excavation as possible and then attempt to seal the site. Once that happens, aggressive and meaningful cleanup of the Canal itself will be counterproductive to the ground sealing and stabilization. The water has to be cleaned as much as possible before the ground pollution gets addressed. Otherwise the Toll Brothers are building a luxury Love Canal.
Sept. 18, 2008, 11:21 pm
Gowanus says:
It isn't physically possible for this project to "benefit the cleanup of the canal. The canal is in such a distressed environmental state precisely because of all of the existing units of housing that already exist within it's watershed!

Building housing, by it's very act, has negative environmental impact. Adding 477 new units of housing, here along the canal, will only be adding insult to injury. A claim to build "green", like using low flow toilets in the construction, may help reduce the intensity of the environmental impact, but cannot possible eliminate the negative effects that will result.

Let's get real here and stop making the same kind of ridicules claims that the mortgage banks were making a year ago. At some point, reality will set in.
Sept. 19, 2008, 12:23 pm
Charles from Brooklyn says:
Lets be honest here. Building large apartments near the canal is a disgusting thought. The canal and surrounding area is extremely poluted, and the proposal to seal-off the ground from the buildings proves the area is still unfit for humans. Please, enough with the zoning changes for big developers. Lets start talking about cleaning up the canal and surrounding area first, before we "seal" off any chance of cleaning this mess up.

The Gowanus should be a public space, a public park if the canal/old river is restored. After cleanup, with wetlands, and flushing to the harbor, we can all enjoy the water and wildlife. And then, afterwards, land owners should be allowed to build appropriately to surround the park/canal, formally known for its miserable state.
Sept. 22, 2008, 6:08 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!