Sections

Community board wants changes in Bloomy Coney rezoney

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Coney Island’s community board called on Wednesday night for Mayor Bloomberg to radically remake his controversial plan for the People’s Playground with concessions to its primary critic: the amusement area’s main landowner, Joe Sitt.

Technically, Community Board 13 voted to approve the mayor’s sweeping rezoning plan that calls for a new city-owned theme park between the Cyclone rollercoaster and the minor league baseball stadium, complemented by 15 acres of privately owned hotels, restaurants and year-round attractions, like an indoor water park.

But the board tacked on 20 amendments, demanding far larger retails stores, a ban on the use of eminent domain, and a rejection of a key part of the mayor’s scheme, the rezoning of some of Coney’s amusement zone to parkland.

The amendments, which are only advisory, are more compatible with Sitt’s vision for the faded amusement area.

Following the heated vote in Coney Island Hospital on Ocean Parkway, the mayor’s office released a mixed statement applauding the “yes” vote on one of Bloomberg’s signature development projects, but indicating the board’s amendments will be ignored.

“While input from the Community Board will no doubt strengthen the plan throughout the process, some of the recommendations made are counter to the plan’s goals, such as doing without the designation of parkland, which would prevent the amusement district from being permanent and reduce the amount of housing, retail and open space we can create outside of it,” Bloomberg said in the statement.

Sitt has alternated between haggling with the city over a price for the 10–1/2 acres he owns between Keyspan Park and the Cyclone, and Surf Avenue and the Boardwalk, and promoting his own $2-billion tourist Xanadu.

He said the outcome of the board’s vote was an improvement, but not a solution to the city’s rezoning.

“The community board’s actions are the beginning of an attempt to make a bad plan better,” said his spokesman, Stefan Friedman. “The recommendations by the community board are helpful, but the city’s plan remains fundamentally flawed and economically unviable.”

Councilman Domenic Recchia (D–Coney Island), who is an ally of Sitt, lobbied the board heavily to adopt the changes to the city’s proposal. His opinion will probably be influential among his peers in the Council when the plan arrives there for its final vote after Borough President Markowitz and the City Planning Commission review it.

The community board’s other main amendments to the Bloomberg plan included banning construction taller than the landmark Parachute Jump, keeping the Keyspan Park parking lot as it is instead of building housing on it, and giving more help to the ailing Boardwalk and New York Aquarium.

Updated 5:21 pm, March 12, 2009
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

JoeS from WhorEquities.com says:
We here at Whor Equities are outraged at the city's plan! We went through all that work bribing city officials and they go and come up with a plan that rapes the amusement area of Coney Island, but they don't finish the job! They only savagely brutalize the amusement area, but they don't fully kill it! I'm sorry, but we want to make sure Coney Island is ruined for all time, so that no man, woman, or child ever wants to go there to have a good time again.
March 12, 2009, 12:30 pm
G Verizinchi from Brighton B says:
Why is Sitt's friend Recchia asking for more retail space? Just two years ago Sitt abandoned his Albee Square Mall project and sold the land to a different developer because he said he was unable to attract major retail to downtown Brooklyn. Now with the economy tanking Sitt is claiming he can bring twice as much major retail all the way to South Brooklyn in an area that was never a major shopping district and has even had most of it's local retail fail?
March 13, 2009, 10:37 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!