Bikes in buildings law is a big flat tire in Brooklyn

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A much-ballyhooed law that is supposed to allow bicycle commuters to bring their wheels into their offices has gone flat in Brooklyn.

Nine months after the “Bikes in Buildings” law went into effect, only 12 applications have been submitted by Brooklyn workers who want to bring their rides into offices — and only four landlords have fully complied with the request, according to the Department of Transportation.

The applicants that failed in their efforts to bring bicycles into the workplace generally faced one problem: a resistant landlord.

Under the much-misunderstood program, cyclists must initiate the process in their workplaces by first formally approaching their boss and requesting to bring a bicycle into the building.

In some cases, that is where the process ended, as many bosses are wary of challenging a landlord.

But if dialogue between the cyclist, his or her boss, and the landlord proceeds, a formal application for bicycle access is filed with the city, which then sends inspectors to approve a plan that specifies how the bikes will be brought in and where they will be stored.

It’s a complicated process, as Clare Miflin, an architect at the firm Kiss and Cathcart in Downtown, discovered.

In her case, the sticking point with her landlord was whether a freight elevator — which is critical for a “bikes in buildings” plan — could accommodate bikes.

“There are only four small elevators in our building, one of which is used for freight — but it’s used by tenants like any other elevator so [the landlord] argued it wasn’t actually a freight elevator [and therefore couldn’t accommodate bikes],” said Miflin.

Her frustrating experience echoed the criticism expressed when the law first went into effect: that it depended on a landlord’s magnanimity — a trait not generally associated with building owners.

Alexandra Farkas, who works for Erikson Translations on Court Street, tried her luck with the bikes in building law, but it did not go well for her, either.

“We succeeded in getting the building to allow us to bring bikes in, but we don’t have room in our offices to park them, and the landlord hasn’t made space available,” said Farkas.

“My coworker put a lot of work into it, but it was kind of a dead end,” Farkas added.

But Robert Hebron, a leasing broker who works throughout Downtown, said that bringing bikes into buildings is easier said than done.

“I’m a cyclist but I can sympathize with landlords — in these older buildings there really is limited space! You want to draw tenants with this as a perk, but there are limited options!”

Of course, for a few lucky applicants in Brooklyn, this process was relatively painless.

“It went extremely well! The building’s management was really cooperative,” said Gail Kovach, who works for the Social Science Research Council, which has offices at 1 Pierrepont Plaza. “We filed the request, two weeks later the manager filed the necessary plan and a week later it was approved. It was really quick!”

After some planning, cyclists and the buildings management were able to make room for bikes in the office, so now roughly 10 two-wheelers are up against the walls and cubicles of the offices of the Social Science Research Council.

“It’s kind of funny seeing the bikes around the office,” said Kovach. “But no one objects and we feel we’re making a small dent in all the pollution of the environment.”

The building is owned by Bruce Ratner, who has also been quick to allow bikes in one of his Metrotech office buildings in Downtown. But the developer has not allowed bikes in his 1 Metrotech Center building.

Department of Transportation spokesman Monty Dean recommended that cyclists who are having trouble convincing their landlord to consider a “bikes in buildings” proposal should contact the agency through its website.

Dean agreed that participation is low in Brooklyn, but the agency expected that to be the case.

“Most of the requests have come from Manhattan due to the density of large commercial buildings there,” Dean said.

All told, the agency has received 324 “bike access plans” citywide, covering up to 2,500 bikes. Not all of those “access plans” have been implemented.

Updated 5:20 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Gary from Park Slope says:
I don't think the article is clear. Under the law the employer must agree to allow bike storage in the leased premises and request a plan from the landlord that gives access to the freight elevator (which the landlord generally must do).

If the landlord is willing to provide indoor bike parking directly, that is another matter.
Sept. 22, 2010, 9:16 am
Bike still locked to a tree from Downtown BK says:
It has taken over six months, and lots of calls to the government, and the landlord of my building still has not fully complied. Freight elevator runs only till 4pm...who works till 4pm in NYC? I can bring the bike up, but can't bring it down? Stairs are off limits according to landlord. Good intentioned law but hopefully it will be tweaked so we who bike can actually utilize it. Since Yassky championed this law, who do we turn to now for improvements?
Sept. 22, 2010, 9:47 am
as from brooklyn says:
I think most buildings, especially in Brooklyn, just let people bring bikes in anyway, so maybe that's the reason for the lack of applications to the city.
Sept. 22, 2010, 11:06 am
jim from work in Hells Kitchen says:
i work in theatre district hi-rise, and my HR department has no interest in responding to my requests that they go to the landlord for bike parking. the kicker; employees 6 floors below me (different company) got approved. FML.
Feb. 22, 2011, 8:43 pm
TG from Midtown says:
Our building just cheerfully announced the installation of bike racks outside along with the caveat: "use at your own risk".... well, DUH!
May 10, 2013, 8:53 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: