Suit: City lied about Prospect Park West bike lane

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The city threw pedestrians into the “lane” of fire by fudging Prospect Park West bike path data and colluding with rabid advocates to stanch opposition, a bombshell lawsuit alleges.

Neighbors for Better Bike Lanes and Seniors for Safety, two groups that oppose the lane, filed a lawsuit on Monday in Brooklyn Supreme Court, claiming that the “experimental” project has created dangerously “inconsistent traffic patterns” and “limited visibility” for everyone on the busy street.

The lawsuit demands that the lane be dismantled and calls for a truly independent study of traffic and safety conditions along the roadway.

“[The city] promised a thorough and objective study, and instead we got a coordinated effort to mislead the public and openly attack people concerned about safety conditions,” said Seniors for Safety President Lois Carswell.

Court documents paint a cozy relationship between lane supporters and Ryan Russo, the Department of Transporta­tion’s assistant commissioner for traffic management — an official responsible for “interpreting and presenting the … misleading and skewed data,” according to court papers.

Last June, the group discovered through the Freedom of Information Act, that Russo told bike blogger Aaron Naparstek that the lane was “under serious attack [from] important people talking to other important people.”

The reference to “important people” is to former Transportation Commissioner Iris Weinshall and former Sanitation Commissioner Norman Steisel, who are both part of the opposition.

Russo told Naparstek that their anti-bike–lane efforts needed “neutralizi­ng.” After Naparstek called lane the opponents “shameless, selfish pigs,” Russo wrote, “That’s quite enjoyable.”

The lane foes’ lawyer called the exchange “the tip of the iceberg.”

“The serious misconduct of these Transportation officials is a breach of the public trust and deserves further investigation and sanction,” said the lawyer, Jim Walden, who has contributed to the election campaigns of Sen. Charles Schumer — the bike-loving lawmaker who is married to Weinshall.

Department of Transportation officials would not comment specifically about the e-mail exchange, but said it has been in conversation with both sides of the issue.

“We always talk to supporters and to opponents to get the facts out on an issue and to advocate for policies we believe can best serve the city,” spokesman Seth Solomonow said. “The record here clearly shows that we spoke with people on all sides of this topic. We provided data to the community board earlier this year and categorically reject any claim that it is inaccurate.”

Lane supporters fired back on Tuesday, rallying at City Hall to decry the lawsuit as meritless and herald the lane as a driving factor behind a drastic, 63-percent reduction in accidents along the grand boulevard.

“Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I believe this lawsuit disregards the opinions and jeopardizes the safety of the community,” said Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope).

Some seniors for safety were on hand — to cheer the lane.

“I use the bike lane whenever I get the opportunity,” said Gene Aronowitz, 73. “Aren’t I entitled to be safe as I ride the streets?”

Lane backers added that there is no evidence to show that the city acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.

“In fact, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary,” said Gary Reilly, a Carroll Gardens resident and lawyer.

The city originally pitched the controversial two-way lane in 2009 as a traffic-calming measure that would reduce speeding on the hectic throughway. But backers pointed out that as far back as 2007, CB6 petitioned the city to install the protected path as a way to slow speeding traffic.

Despite opposition, the lane was painted last spring, and the Department of Transportation has consistently trumpeted it as a success, presenting data that shows fewer cars now speed, fewer bicyclists use the sidewalk and fewer cyclists get into accidents.

The city is moving to dress up the lane, and plans to add an array of safety measures, raised pedestrian islands and rumble strips, alerting cyclists to yield. New trees are also being contemplated. On Thursday night, CB6 was set to weigh the changes, which could be implemented this spring.

Critics, such as former deputy mayor Norman Steisel, said the measures are akin to putting lipstick on a pig.

”You’re talking about physical and cosmetic improvemen­ts,” he said. “My problem is fundamentally with the current lane configurat­ion.”

Community Board 6 will discuss the enhancements at the John Jay HS [237 Seventh Avenue between Fourth and Fifth streets in Park Slope, (718) 643-3027], March 10 at 6:30 pm.

Updated 5:23 pm, July 9, 2018: Adds substantially more context and reporting.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Mike says:
Sad that these NIMBYs are fighting these proven, successful street safety improvements that are the result of years of community requests, and that have made the street so much safer. And shame on Gibson Dunn for perverting pro bono as a gift to the rich, powerful, and politically connected.

Most people's tantrums don't cost the city millions of dollars in legal fees. This one will. Shameful.
March 8, 2011, 1:21 am
Sheen from Cali says:
Flatulent trolls on two wheels think they can drink tiger blood and WIN. Fastball. we're hitting soft targets and winning. stay tuned
March 8, 2011, 2:20 am
Nelson Judd from Chicago says:
We're all pretty bizarre. Some of us are just better at hiding it, that's all.
March 8, 2011, 2:23 am
cars out from bike nation says:
Just wait until the lovely Janette Sadik-Khan is elected mayor and she removes all the cars from this beautiful city. All you teabaggers that hate bikes will be crying then.
March 8, 2011, 6:46 am
Dan from Park Slope says:
I'm amazed that this is still an issue. Every single time people complain about this bike lane, five times as many people voice support. I grew up in Park Slope and a safer Prospect Park West was a common neighborhood dream for years. Now that this wonderful improvement has finally happened the city's worst former DOT commissioner and her friends are intent on using their elevated influence to bypass the community's best wishes. I can't believe I used to be proud to live in the same neighborhood as Schumer. Never again in the voting booth for these spoiled brat sore losers.
March 8, 2011, 7:09 am
Peter from Park Slope says:
Hey, Brooklyn Paper - not a single mention of *who* makes up NBBL?

We're talking about a small organization whose main members are Lois Weinshall (former DOT commissioner), Norman Steisel (former Sanitation Commissioner), and Louise Hainline (dean at Brooklyn College). 3 people used to driving everywhere, and parking easily with the parking placards they've received (legally or not). All live along Prospect Park West, and all have complained about the inconvenience because they find it harder to illegally double park along PPW.

This isn't about safety. This isn't about procedure. This is about a small minority of politically well-connected people (Weinshall is also Senator Chuck Schumer's wife) fighting to rip out something that inconveniences *them*, regardless of it's incredible benefit to the community.

How come there's absolutely no mention of NBBL's makeup in your article? This isn't about widows and orphans suing against the terrible machine of the DOT. This is a bunch of spoiled whiners who want to game the system to get their way at the expense of the community.
March 8, 2011, 7:48 am
Resident from PPW says:
Commissioner Sadik-Khan, tear down the bicycle lane!
March 8, 2011, 8:02 am
Jean from Park Slope says:
What? This is terrible news. The bike lane has meant so much for me and my kids .. we can get around on bikes and it's so great to see my kids doing that! Sounds like these people need to grow up! or at least get out of their cars once in a while.
March 8, 2011, 8:17 am
Josh from Brooklyn says:
Surreal. In normal land, seniors would be suing to stop the removal of a bike lane along a park to make way for a high-speed three lane road that imperils the safety and quality of life for all. But in Iris Weinshall's Park Slope, they're suing for the exact opposite.

Boggles the mind, I tell you...
March 8, 2011, 9:36 am
Arlen from PPW says:
I've read the lawsuit and it has little merit, with "facts" contradicting other "facts" within the span of a few paragraphs.

Louise Hainline is a dean at Brooklyn College and signed her name to this. If it were an academic paper, she'd lose her tenure.

This is truly shameful. A project that most people love and that has saved lives and made the neighborhood more pleasant is being challenged, pro bono, by a group of rich people. Hainline lives at 9 PPW, where apartments sell for upwards of $3 million. She's costing our city millions at a time of terrible budget crisis.

Shame on her. We need better neighbors.
March 8, 2011, 9:59 am
James Lang from Park Slope says:
What the plaintiffs couldn't accomplish in the court of public opinion they are now trying to accomplish at taxpayer expense in the judicial system. You don't need to have extensive surveys by DOT with electronic equipment to verify that PPW is now significantly safer. It is apparent to the naked eye and ear. Traffic is noticeably slower, calmer and quieter with less weaving, high speed passing, and racing to the next light. This might upset those who think that unfettered use of an automobile is a divine right, but the greater good of the community is served by the bike lane.
March 8, 2011, 10:43 am
Joey from Clinton Hills says:
Charles Schumer, Anthony Weiner...I will never vote for either of you putzes.
March 8, 2011, 10:49 am
ilovebrooklyn from PPW says:
The people I talk to on PPW (where I live as well) are generally in favor of the bike lane. I have a feeling these people are in the minority -- both on PPW and in the neighborhood as a whole.
March 8, 2011, 11:32 am
Steve from PPW says:
They claim only 215 members between NBBL and Seniors for Safety, although many are members of both groups, so the numbers may be smaller. 215 people out of tens of thousands in Park Slope and the general area.

They only got 50 or so people to come to their rally. "Radical bike activists" had hundreds. At the last CB6 meeting, the ratio was about the same.

No matter what happens anywhere, there will always be a minority of people opposed to something. This time, that minority is made up of well-connected, rich people who are costing the city millions. They need to stop this, respect the public process and public opinion, and work on solving bigger issues.

These people have no interest in sacrificing one or two parking spaces every couple of blocks in order to make the neighborhood safer. Selfish selfish selfish. Some of them are so old that they are fighting a battle most of them won't be around to see for very long. It's sad.
March 8, 2011, 11:41 am
Kevin from GP says:
Why someone would prefer to have a 3 lanes of traffic outside their window is beyond me.
March 8, 2011, 12:11 pm
Steve, According to the survey, half of the people who live on PPW don't like the bike lane, and 30% of park slope don't like it. While that is not a super majority, its also not a couple of fat cats like you and others are claiming.
Now, it may be true that the fat cats are the ones filling the suit, its also may be just, if not more likely, that they are the ones with the actual means to bring the suit, that at least half to the people who live on PPW agree with and at least roughly 30% of park slope in general agree with. Its not three people in a room like you are trying to argue.
As for the number at the rally, the bike people had more because they are organized city wide and they can bring in people from around the city, and they do this at other bike rallys.
The anti-bike lane people are all from one hood. People are not getting on the BQE and coming to park slope form Queens to protest a bike lane. So your numbers game is really bogus on its face.
And EVEN if we agree with you on your numbers, 63,000 live in park slope and all you got was a couple hundred?
NOT an impressive mandate at all! In fact that's about the same amount of people the organization against you has on its rolls, so basically you are even strength, so for you to sit there and call them names and claim that they are a fat cat bitter selfish minority that is costing the city millions is really just not true.
Besides One could just as easily argue that the bike lane cost the city millions and never should have been done in the first place.
So guess what the lesson is, government and rule of law and the process to support that rule of law costs money. If you don't like that, move to Libya where a name calling person like you will fit right in with Qadaffi.
Finally STEVE, you bring a persons age into this? That is just straight up discrimination. Who the hell do you think you are to engage in that? SHAME SHAME SHAME on you!!!!
ARELN, are you a lawyer? Do you have a license to practice in New York did you go to law school and pass a bar exam?
Just wondering what your qualifications are to evaluate the merits of a law suit?
Furthermore Arlen, What are your qualifications for claiming that Lousiee Hanline would lose her tenure? Are you a department chair at a college or university? Or are you just a big mouth liar?
And furthermore what does her job have to do with any of the merits on the suit like you claim or where they live or what they may or may not have paid for where they live?
If any of the people against you on this issue have a job that is somehow relevant to this issue, then what do you do for a living? What is your background and what is your character? Have you ever been arrested? Have you ever been fired? Have you ever had a chemical dependency problem? Have you had an extra-martial affair? Where do you live and how much did you pay for it?
Clearly, if that information is important to the merits of the bike lane, since you seem to think what the people on the otherside of this argument do for a living is so relevant to this issue, then you need to provide the same information about yourself. Will you do so, or will you be a coward?
So please, tell us what makes you sooo much better and honest than them? What? Anything? What a smaller paycheck means you are a better person, is that your argument? Come on, tell us?
March 8, 2011, 12:35 pm
Scott from Park Slope says:
Lois Weinshall and her husband, Chuck Schumer, need to be heartily invited to get the hell out of our neighborhood. I've gone jogging in the Park loop behind Lois and her personal secretary and listened to them complain about Progressives and Democrats in the neighborhood, trying to tell them what to do. Newsflash: in a democracy, elected representatives work for the People, not command them. If you don't like it, then move to Texas or some other similar state where everyone secretly longs to live in a dictatorship.

I love the PPW bike lanes. They slow down traffic to the point where I feel reasonably sure my kids can cross them without getting killed. That was not true before. If Lois succeeds in removing the bike lanes and returning PPW to the kill zone it was before, I will head the committee to help them get the hell out of our neighborhood. Forcibly.
March 8, 2011, 12:37 pm
Howard from Prospect Park West says:
In the NY Times article they wrote, "The suit also quotes e-mail correspondence that suggests a close relationship between top Department of Transportation officials and the cycling advocates who are vocal supporters of expanding the city’s bicycle network."

Just curious, is this a true statement?
March 8, 2011, 12:41 pm
Ace from New Utrecht says:
212-486-4430 let Chuck know that if he does not come out in favor of the bike lane then you will not vote for him.

go to his website and send him an email:
March 8, 2011, 12:43 pm
Frank from Furter says:
The bike lane went through the normal community board review. The local politicians have all supported it. Not Marty but then he isn't a local politician. he doesn't like the neighbors at the Park in Coney Island either.
There are surely emails between people. Whether they were a "close relationship" characterizes the a way to support the lawsuit? BTW The arbitrary and capricious standard is as long as the DOT had any reason(whether you like it or not) the courts generally defer to them as the experts. The lawsuit has a tough road(pun intended) to carry before it wins. BTW the City uses in house Corporate won't cost millions to get to a decision(probably one day in court and a couple of fruitless appeals)....
March 8, 2011, 12:47 pm
Maggie from Park Slope says:
Scott: You might have the wrong person. first, her name is Iris, not Lois. Second, she doesn't have a personal secretary. Third, it would be rather odd for her to be complaining about "Progressives and Democrats" given that her husband is both progressive and a democrat.
March 8, 2011, 12:54 pm
adam from bedstuy says:
accidents are down 16%! isn't that reason enough? what's the trade-off for a parking spot/speeding and a human life? maybe we should ask schumers wife and all of these other haters.
March 8, 2011, 12:59 pm
Mike from Williamsburg says:
Why do these people think that living in an apartment on PPW means that they own PPW? The street is a public space and I have as much claim to use it from Williamsburg as they do.
March 8, 2011, 1:10 pm
Gary from Carroll Gardens says:
This lawsuit is absolutely without merit and any attorney, let alone a partner from a prominent firm like Gibson Dunn, should be embarrassed to attach their name to it.

And the firm has the gall to call currying favor with a powerful and wealthy minority opposed to a community facility "pro bono" work? What a disgrace.
March 8, 2011, 2:17 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
I am just waiting for Tal to give us his statement.
March 8, 2011, 2:34 pm
Judd from Forthedefense says:
This is hardly pro bono as defined by NY State Bar:

Pro Bono Legal Services will include all uncompensated legal services that are: (a)
rendered directly to poor persons in civil matters or in criminal matters or related to
simplifying the legal process for, or increasing the availability and quality of legal
services to, poor persons; (b) rendered to charitable, public interest organizations with
respect to matters or projects designed predominately to address the needs of poor
persons, (c) rendered to individuals, groups, or organizations seeking to secure or protect
civil rights, civil liberties or public rights, (d) rendered to charitable, religious, civic,
community, governmental or educational organizations in matters in furtherance of their
organizational purposes, where the payment of standard legal fees would significantly
deplete the organization’s economic resources or would be otherwise inappropriate, or (e)
involve societal issues, such as pre-approved special projects or cases involving
significant legal issues such a death penalty case or cases assigned to attorneys by the
Court, for which they receive no fee or a nominal fee (such as prisoner civil rights cases).

It would not surprise me if firms are allowed a tax break for providing Pro Bono services -Sue You Sue Me Blues
March 8, 2011, 3:11 pm
Judd from Forthedefense says:
hmmm maybe (c)could be argued here...
March 8, 2011, 3:17 pm
Dick from Park Slope says:
As a car driver and a bicyclist in Brooklyn the truth is that I think we all need to get over our selfish wants and needs and think about the overall safety of the people on them. Bikes should not run over pedestrians, cars should not run over bikes. The pedestrians get the sidewalk to use safely without the threat of both cars and bikes. As the number of bikes is expanding exponentially in Brooklyn we need to think about the safest way to share the roads between bikes and cars. Is this a bike lane? I'm not sure but this senseless polarized arguing doesn't seem to be getting us anywhere.
March 8, 2011, 4:23 pm
Andrew from Williamsburg says:

Yes, the emails were sent. It makes sense that DOT's bicycle program would be working closely with local pro-bike organizations to promote awareness and develop grassroots support for bicycle infrastructure improvements. I think anyone would be surprised if they WEREN'T working together.

Also, DOT's policy director used to be the ED for Transportation Alternatives and Tri-State Transportation Campaign.
March 8, 2011, 4:37 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
First off, thank you CITIZENJAY for saying all of that, because I too am tired of people who hide behind their screens making personal attacks at those that don't agree with them. Also, I thank Anthony Weiner for standing up to JSK and seeing her for who she really is on bike lanes just like how he did to Bloomberg on congestion pricing. If I was living in the city, I would vote for him for mayor. As for the lawsuit, I wish the best of luck for NBBL. Those who hope it will fail sound just like those who have naysayed DDDB on theirs' in the past, and hope that the one next week will fail as well. At least we know that the opposition is homegrown and not transplanted as what radical cyclist groups such as Streetsblog and TA do to help inflate their numbers in the claim that they always outnumber.
March 8, 2011, 5:01 pm
Pete from President and PPW says:
The bike lane is awesome. Schumer's wife is like a giant baby taking away the bike lane from the little people because she has in her head that it makes PPW less safe. I mostly surprised that I now have a reason to not vote for Chuck. I hope there is a Democratic Contender in the next Senate race in favor of bike lanes...and the little people.

Also, small point but, maybe the smoothie, muffin, dumpling, ice cream truck could park somewhere other than the corner of PPW and GAP in front of a fire hydrant. These trucks inhibit the flow of traffic and hurt visibility on that corner.
March 8, 2011, 5:31 pm
Common from sense says:
HAHAHAHA you are all idiots.. this is the stupidest and most ridiculous issue I've ever seen anyone argue over. I was just reading the police reports in this paper.. now there are some issues there.
March 8, 2011, 7:01 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:

Support for the bike lane on PPW is homegrown. I know that because I talk to my neighbors about it. WE like it. and I am surely not part of any radical cyclist group. I am a parent and a pedestrian and a car driver living a block from PPW.

MY question to you is where is your concern coming from? You are neither home grown nor a transplant. Are you an outside agitator?

What does this have to do with DDDB?
March 8, 2011, 7:22 pm
sheen from cali says:
Still winning.
March 8, 2011, 7:38 pm
Mike says:
Don't engage with Tal. You'll only regret it.
March 8, 2011, 7:43 pm
Ben from Greenpoint says:
people.. soon its coming baby carriage lanes...
March 8, 2011, 10:25 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Other Michael, if you have been following the Atlantic Yards as much as I do, you will know exactly what I mean when comparing NBBL to DDDB, and they too have been stereotyped as being selfish just for opposing that the way this group is.
March 8, 2011, 11:09 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
Tal I follow the bondogal of the Atlantic Yards a little. DDDB are Brooklynites opposing a massive, unnecessary construction project that will benefit foreign investors and mega corporations.

But what are you talking about.
March 9, 2011, 5:46 am
LOLcat from Park Slope says:
@ Other Michael,

Don't forget corrupt. Can't wait to see all the surface parking that replaces the "blight"
March 9, 2011, 10 am
StephenPaul from Carroll St & PPW says:
Ay dios mio! These fat cats opposed to the bike lane are really fat! Steisel & Markowitz could use a little weight loss. Riding bikes, perhaps? Marty gets chuffered to/from downtown to Fuller Place every morning and evening. As to CUNY Vice Chancellor Weinshall. I think they pick her up and drive her around using--surprise--a taxpayer funded car! She hasn't worked a private sector job for a living in thiry years. Livin La Vida Loco on gov't taxlevy dollars! Husband, too. 1/2 million cash salaries combined per year. Muy bueno for lux coop on PPW. Now I understand the Governor of Wisconsin!
March 9, 2011, 2:03 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
I don't know much about the law. I did not know you can sue the government to undo something it did because the rational for doing it was based on a (perceived) lie.

Wouldn't it have been wonderful if the NBBL people would have used their powers for good and undid the whole Iraq thing.
March 9, 2011, 4:19 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
StephenPaul, please prove everything you said about them, or I will consider it to be slander. Either way, they don't deserve to be given a personal attack just for taking the other side. BTW, that statement on being fat offends me, because I tend to be overweight, and I am a victim to such attacks like that myself. You wouldn't like it if I called cyclists stickboys for usually being slim, so knock it off. There are other ways to lose weight besides riding bicycles and that includes and just walking alone is one of them. Statements like this are just going to make you look bad, and if they were reading this, they would see you as nothing more than a wacko attacko.
March 9, 2011, 6:48 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Other Michael, since you were probably on the Daily News today, I suggest you read what was said on the editorials, local section, and even the Voice of the People, because they had a lot to say about JSK today.
March 9, 2011, 6:49 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
We don't get the Daily News in Park Slope.
March 9, 2011, 8:43 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:

I hope you do not consider that slander.
March 9, 2011, 9:11 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
You can get this at convenient stores as well as going online to the website, which it has, but I will probably just give the links to what I was talking about.
March 9, 2011, 9:13 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
Thanks Tal. But I saw the first one. I bet you know that.

But the third link is cool. I am actually in the photo.

(No I am not the guy on the bike holding the sign (I know him). I am a tiny guy in the background.)
March 9, 2011, 9:28 pm
Slopie from Slope says:
(1) 20-25% of bicyclists believe they are death proof and ride as if that was true. Headphones? Expecting cars to yield [in Brooklyn - really now]? Turing in front of cars in traffic? Nearly taking double forward flips head first by narrowly missing pedestrians? No helmets? Coaster brakes used by adults? Not looking over shoulder or using a mirror before taking wide turns or swinging out into traffic? Ignoring traffic signals and stop signs and then being annoyed when the world doesn't? You name it, I've seen it. And I ride a bike, just not in the above manner. If I did I would fully expect to end up in traction.

(2) To park along the bike lane you have to PULL into it or else risk getting T-boned by a livery cab, especially on the stretch nearest Grand Army Plaza.

(3) I love bikes and I love cars but we just got's to get along y'all. . .

(4) People are going to throw out Schumer over this shizzle?

(5) I haven't seen anyone in the now narrower lanes slowing down. . .

(6) Be happy you don't live in Libya.
March 10, 2011, 8:34 pm
Ann from Park Slope says:
On the real, Slopie. Went to the cb6 meeting today. First, I think we can all agree that it was as hot as hell. Second, best performance art for free moment: the lady who proclaimed that the biggest threat to her safety was "blue haired ladies so busy adjusting their mink stoles" that they might door her. I have lived in park slope for a long time. Take it from me: we have neither blue haired ladies nor mink stoles.
But it was righteous.
March 10, 2011, 10:22 pm
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
I thought she was balanced by the 6 foot man who can see bikes coming who said "the bike lane made his life a living hell."

There was a balance of over drama
March 11, 2011, 6:54 am
Ann from Park slope says:
Excellent! I missed that one. Maybe they should have coffee or something.
March 11, 2011, 8:14 am
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
I did not get to speak, but this was my statement:

I am "PRO" bike lane but I am not a biker. I am certainly not a member of the "Bike Lobby"

Even thought I live on 8th Ave so I hope my opinions count as much as those who live on PPW.

I represent 2 organizations.

First I am a member of the Prospect Park Track club. As a pedestrian, the Class 1 bike lane makes it easier to cross the street. As one approaches the bike lane from either direction one can easily see if a bike is coming for blocks. The stripped zone between the parked cars and the bike lane give more than enough room to see past even the tallest SUV. This stripped zone also gives drivers room to get out of their car with out "dooring" a bike.

I am also a member of the Automobile Association of America. As a driver I am glad to see the bikes off the road and onto their own protected bike lane. PPW is now one road were I don't have to be worried about a bike swerving in front of my car because the rider is about to be doored or because a Fresh Direct truck is using the dangerous Class 1 bike lane to store their vehicular while unloading.
March 11, 2011, 10:32 am
ann from Park Slope says:
But do you have a mink stole?
March 11, 2011, 10:52 am
Other Michael from Park Slope says:
ann, i consider that slander.

he he he eh
March 11, 2011, 3:40 pm
Ann from Park Slope says:
I wish I had a mink stole. and a pony. Which I would ride.....every day.....(wait for it)....IN THE BIKE LANE.
March 11, 2011, 3:57 pm
Steven from park slope says:
I was born and raised in park slope brooklyn and see no need for a bike lane outside prospect park when you can ride inside. These bike lanes slow up traffic, make more stand still ,congestion and more ppollution. I drive and ride a bike for years. And it has not made much of a diffrents at all.
Aug. 21, 2011, 10:20 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: