Fire fighters: G’point environmentalists protest incineration plant plan

The Brooklyn Paper

The city may install a kinder, gentler incinerator along the Newtown Creek — but Greenpoint residents say they’re the ones who would get burned.

The Department of Sanitation will evaluate proposals for a new facility that will convert 900 tons of solid waste per day into energy at nine possible locations in the city, including the National Grid site off Varick Avenue.

The plant would use new technologies, such as anaerobic digestion, gasification, and hydrolysis — techniques Mayor Bloomberg touted as cutting edge in the waste-to-power game — to turn trash into energy instead of simply lighting the garbage on fire and then chucking it into a landfill.

“Using less and recycling more are the most effective ways to address the problem, but this project will help us determine if some of that waste can be converted to safe, clean energy to meet the city’s growing power needs,” Bloomberg said.

A sanitation spokeswoman insists the new facility is “not an incinerator” and would not use conventional “mass burn” techniques, but environmental advocates warn that most other methods — which turn garbage into a gas and then ignite the vapor — still release toxic byproducts into the air and should not be used in densely populated areas.

“It’s still an incinerator — you could put lipstick on a pig and it’s still a pig,” said Michael Heimbinder of the environmental mapping group, Habitat Maps. “This is not a solution to our garbage issue.”

The proposal arose from the city’s efforts to double the rate of waste diverted from landfills from 15 percent to 30 percent, starting in 2006.

City facilities handle 10,000 tons of garbage from per day and nearly three million tons per year — about 40 percent of which gets processed in transfer stations in Greenpoint and Williamsburg. That’s far too much according to neighborhood activists, who say the last thing North Brooklyn needs is another waste transfer station.

“It’s good that the mayor is looking at different ways to handle the city’s waste, but we’re concerned about this,” said Greenpoint resident Laura Hofmann, whose activist group, OUTRAGE, sent a letter to Mayor Bloomberg last month along with 30 other environmental organizations to protest the proposal. “An incinerator would further jeopardize the air quality. Between an increase in waste truck traffic and rising asthma rates, this could affect our health.”

Neighborhood residents have stopped incinerators in North Brooklyn in the past, most famously stymieing former Mayor Koch’s plan in 1981 to add an incinerator in the Brooklyn Navy Yard.

But the new site would be much closer to Greenpoint residents — National Grid’s land is only a few blocks from a large public housing complex and scores of other homes.

And the city is also considering locating the facility at the Phelps Dodge plot, just across from Greenpoint in Queens. Both plots of land are currently considered state Superfund sites, and are being eyed by federal environmental investigators for polluting Newtown Creek.

Instead of constructing the trash-to-power plant, Heimbinder argues the city should build marine transfer stations, which would remove garbage via the city’s waterways, or expand anaerobic gas facilities such as the pilot factory at the Newtown Creek sewage plant.

“This is not a clean technology, it is not better for the environment, and it is not cost-effective,” said Heimbinder. “This is mind-boggling!”

The city says proposals for the site are due on June 5.

Reader Feedback

Mike from Maspeth says:
Hey, Mayor Bloomberg! Did you even read the 2006 agreement? Where's the Manhattan Waste Transfer Station? You're trying to back out of an agreement YOU MADE! Let's not let him get away with this!
March 8, 2012, 11:38 am
D in Queens from LIC says:
We all live in Asthma Alley - and the primary cause is from all the buildings still burning heavy fuel oil for heating. It's simply a geographical issue.
Modern incineration is infinitely cleaner than heavy fuel oil, so convert all Greenpoint buildings burning heavy to natural gas before this plant opens.
Consumers must own up to all the garbage they cause.
March 8, 2012, 7:16 pm
Josh Rubin from Williamsburg says:
I know the feeling.
March 8, 2012, 9:40 pm
VMGillen from Staten Island says:
We are also in an RFEI for a facility... originally this was proposed for the former (Fresh Kills) dump, but universal outrage from politicians (pet project: turning dump into recreation) seems to have put an end to that idea. INSTEAD, they are looking to site the plant on private, v. City-owned, property. Like other outer-borough areas, zoning was originally determined by "whose cousin are you" methods: we have M1-3 (you can build atom bombs) right next to R - residential, in one to two-block wide swaths. On the North shore these neighborhoods are primarily filled with families with no voice or power - so I'm pretty sure we will see proposals to install a plant right by a bus stop, across the street from homes.

Are any of these proposed for the sacred promised land, Manhattan?
March 9, 2012, 9:29 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: