Sections

Pols won’t support rezoning CitiStorage lot for anything but parkland

Pols to DeBlasio: Buy promised Bushwick Inlet Park land before it’s too late!

Man of letters: Councilman Steve Levin — one of several pols who wrote to DeBlasio urging him to save land for Bushwick Inlet Park — at a rally for the park earlier this year.
The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

The city should stonewall any efforts to develop a Williamsburg waterfront lot it has long promised to turn into parkland by refusing to rezone it for apartments or office buildings, say elected officials in a recent letter to Mayor DeBlasio.

As real estate companies move in to acquire the coveted CitiStorage warehouses between N. 10th and N. 11th streets, the pols are demanding Hizzoner finally honor a pledge the city made a decade ago to buy them and use the land to expand Bushwick Inlet Park, vowing they will never support rezoning it into anything but green space anyway.

“We want to be clear that we will not support any rezoning of any part of the promised Bushwick Inlet Park,” read the Oct. 22 letter signed by Borough President Adams, and councilmen Stephen Levin (D–Greenpoint) and Antonio Reynoso (D–Williamsbu­rg), among others, backing up a similar resolution Community Board 1 passed earlier in the month. “After 10 years, it is time for the City of New York to live up to its promise to the citizens of Williamsburg and Greenpoint, who have been waiting for decades to have access to their waterfront.”

The 11-acre property is one of several parcels of land the city in 2005 pledged to buy and turn into a 28-acre, five-and-a-half-block park — compensation for rezoning much of the waterfront to allow developers to erect luxury high-rises along the shore.

The city has since acquired all the other promised plots — though only turned around a fraction of it into parkland so far — but has still not purchased the central CitiStorage lot from owner Norman Brodsky, who has in the meantime jacked up his asking price to upwards of $300 million.

Now park supporters are nervous it will soon be too late, after developers Midtown Equities and East End Capital signed an option to purchase the property in May.

But the land is currently zoned for manufacturing, and the developers would have to obtain the Council’s okay if they want to make their money back by building housing or offices there, so park activists hope the pols’ decree will make them reconsider the purchase.

“I would think Midtown Equities and Norman Brodsky are probably going back to the table and trying to reassess what this really means for the development,” said Katherine Thompson, co-chair of community group Friends of Bushwick Inlet Park, which last month delivered a coffin to Midtown Equities’ offices declaring any development at the site “dead on arrival.”

The rezoning would not require Levin or Reynoso’s support specifically — just a majority of the Council — but members often defer to the wishes of the local representatives,

Midtown Equities declined to comment on the status of the company’s bid, but a lawyer for the company said it is well aware of the opposition to it owning or developing the land.

“The owners received the copy of the correspondence and they’re reviewing it,” said attorney Ken Fisher.

A city rep would not say whether the city still has any plans to buy the property, but noted it has already poured $225 million into buying up the rest of the parkland.

The letter-writing pols want the city to use eminent domain to acquire the lot, though that doesn’t necessarily ensure a lower price — it ended up having to pay $90 million for the first seven acres of the park alone by employing that mechanism, according to a New York Times report.

State Sens. Daniel Squadron (D–Brooklyn Heights) and Martin Dilan (D–Bushwick), and Assemblyman Joe Lentol (D–Williamsbu­rg) — who also signed the letter — introduced a bill in June that would allow the state to acquire the land through eminent domain, but it didn’t make it past committee before the end of the 2015 session.

East End Capital and CitiStorage did not respond to requests for comment by press time.

Reach reporter Allegra Hobbs at ahobbs@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–8312.
Updated 1:23 pm, November 2, 2015: Updated to correct figures.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Richard from Williamsburg says:
We in the neighborhood, especially the dwindling non-wealthy among us, need this park desperately.
Nov. 2, 2015, 10:51 am
bkmanhatman from nubrucklyn says:
Time to fight the evil developers and landlords!
Nov. 2, 2015, 11:10 am
stan chaz from greenpoint says:
This figure below is obviously an error in your article -ridiculously low
"who has in the meantime jacked up his asking price to upwards of $300,000."
Nov. 2, 2015, 1:06 pm
Ruth Brown (Brooklyn Paper) says:
Ah, well spotted, stan -- it should be $300 million. I will fix.
Nov. 2, 2015, 1:25 pm
Charles from Bklyn says:
Finally some politicians representing their constituents against developers that don't even own the land.
Nov. 2, 2015, 1:43 pm
Marsha Rimler from Heights says:
Many of our electeds cave time and again .. when under pressure from the real estate industry. They change positions, become scarce, etc etc.. Some of the very electeds you mentioned have done this
Lets see if they can maintain their position(s) here.
Nov. 2, 2015, 5:29 pm
Yeah right from Deep pockets says:
These Pols are grand standing because of the elections. Once the developers grease their campaigns they will quiet down. Stay tuned for the 'compromise' park/residential/commercial development.
Nov. 2, 2015, 9:06 pm
Crawdad from Northside says:
Housing people is far more important than new grass. The neighborhood has tons of new parkland anyways, and any new housing would have to include a waterfront park.

Basically these "park advocates" are just NIMBYs who don't want new housing. The new housing would pay for the new parkland, but the fact they're against new housing (the mechanism for funding the thing they claim to support) is very telling.
Nov. 4, 2015, 9:04 am
Ian from Williamsburg says:
Crawdad, I suspect some vested interest in this project and rezoning because if you were a true northside resident you would know we don't have "tons of new parkland". We have among the lowest per capita greens pace in the city and if you ever tried to get access to the sports fields you'd know quite well there's insufficient capacity for our children.
Nov. 4, 2015, 9:13 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!