Skyline shocker! No sign can replace ‘Watchtower,’ because it was illegal all along, officials claim

Gone: The old Watchtower letters.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The new owners of the former Jehovah’s Witnesses headquarters in Brooklyn Heights can not hang another sign atop the building where the iconic Watchtower letters once floated — and must remove the flashing time and temperature display that still remains — because the signage was never legal for the decades it hovered above the borough, according to some city officials.

Department of Buildings bigwigs denied developer conglomerate Columbia Heights Associates’s application to erect a new sign on the still-standing framework on top of the 30 Columbia Heights complex, which the builders bought in 2016, because they claimed honchos at E.R. Squibb and Sons, the original occupant, failed to obtain the proper permits for the Squibb sign they hung there in 1961, and that the Witnesses followed suit, illegally installing their Watchtower
characters in 1970.

“When the sign was erected in 1961, Squibb, the owner of the property at that time, did not obtain the necessary permits, so the signs have never been legal,” said an agency spokeswoman.

And even if the signs of the past were permitted, changes to the area’s zoning regulations made the same year Squibb brass erected their moniker now forbid such structures from crowning buildings in the neighborhood, the spokeswoman said.

Workers tore the Witnesses’ 15-foot neon-red letters from the framework last December, months after Columbia Heights Associates — now a two-firm partnership between builders Livwrk and CIM Group after President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and his family’s Kushner Companies divested their stakes in June — filed an application in March 2017 to replace the Watchtower sign with its own “30 CH” moniker.

The Buildings Department rejected that application because it was incomplete, according to a spokeswoman, but the developer conglomerate earlier this year suggested it hadn’t given up its desire to make a mark on the neighborhood’s skyline when it debuted a website for the swanky office-and-retail complex it is constructing inside the religious group’s former headquarters — which it rechristened as “Panorama” — that featured a rendering depicting neon-red letters spelling that name atop the structure.

And Columbia Heights Associates leaders are fighting the agency’s ruling with the city’s Board of Standards and Appeals, before which their attorney argued that it’s plausible an original occupant acquired a permit for the first Squibb sign that the department may have lost because its records were not kept as meticulously then as they are now — especially since some documents suggest the earlier owners asked for permission to put up the signage.

“Fifty-six years after its installation, the Department of Buildings has made the extraordinary determination that the sign has been illegal for that entire period,” lawyer David Karnovsky said during the Aug. 7 hearing. “A reasonable and logical inference can be drawn that a permit was issued at that time — especially dating back to 1961, for which there are unlikely to be complete records.”

Plus, zoning laws aside, the fact that the Watchtower sign and its predecessor stood for so long that they became synonymous with the Brooklyn Heights skyline should be reason enough to allow a third to take their place, Karnovsky told the board.

“For decades, this sign in a highly visible location, adjacent to the Brooklyn Bridge, was an iconic presence in the skyline,” he said. “It was one of the city’s most-prominent and recognizable displays.”

The board is reviewing the appeal, and will reconvene to continue the hearing on Oct. 23, according to a spokesman.

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Updated 5:51 pm, August 15, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

wheres the fines from Brooklyn says:
If the sign was illegal, where are the fines since 1961 for it being so?

Convenient enforcement by DOB!

I know they love to hammer private home owners for 10's of thousands, so what about these big wigs for the supposed decades of illegal use??

DOB is all about hitting the little guys that can't throw $ at lawyers to protect them like the big guys can.

Imagine how much money this "religion" has raked in with this sign attracting zombies to work for them for free.

They should pay fines and interest for all the years, pay back the profits at market rate for a sign of this size, and pay the income tax on all the zombies they should have been collecting on all along.
Aug. 13, 2018, 10:59 am
blogger Bill from from Boerum Hill says:
You mean the admonishing command to
can never be viewed again, like from
Mars? Shocking!
Aug. 13, 2018, 1:05 pm
what's the temperature from Downtown Brooklyn says:
So long as the time and temperature remains I'm good. But seriously, why the —— is this only an issue now and if it was an issue why don't the JW have to deal with any fines for their illegal ——?
Aug. 13, 2018, 6:38 pm
biff from bk says:
Years ago a friend of mine used their restroom [had to take a wicked dump] and he didn't flush. It was for all the times they came to his door with their preachy god crap.
Aug. 13, 2018, 7:43 pm
John Doe from Somewhere says:
Maybe no fines were given because no one cared and reported it, just like no one cares about it now.
Aug. 14, 2018, 11:12 am
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
So the "Jesus is coming back in 5 minutes and Halloween is evil" people must have been paying someone off to keep it there all these years. I guess Birthdays are a no-no but bribery is peachy keen.
Aug. 14, 2018, 3:06 pm
John Doe from Somewhere says:
Jim is stupid.
Aug. 15, 2018, 10:04 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: