Bridge to nowhere: Squibb span to Bklyn Bridge Park has no reopening date following latest closure

Still closed: The Squibb Bridge, seen here after park workers barricaded its Squibb Park entry in July.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Brooklyn Heights residents should not hold their breath waiting for the serpentine Squibb Bridge to Brooklyn Bridge Park to reopen following its sudden July closure, because the problem meadow leaders claimed was a single faulty piece of wood is actually a far bigger structural flaw, the stewards said.

“I cannot give anybody a timeline as to how long it will take,” said Eric Landau, head of the semi-private Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation, which maintains the green space. “Sadly, that one piece that showed visual signs of problems is not the only piece where we have deteriorat­ion.”

Park keepers shuttered the zig-zagging crossing from Middagh Street’s Squibb Park to the waterfront lawn in July, alleging a single plank in “poor condition” necessitated its closure, and recruited engineering firm Arup Group — the same company tapped in 2016 to oversee the span’s previous $3-million repair after meadow stewards fired the firm that created the bridge amidst that fix — to survey the damage.

And the engineers, who wrapped their inspection last week, found the lone piece of wood is actually among many that are crumbling due to “higher than expected moisture level,” according to Landau, who assured locals his staffers are as miffed about the span’s second prolonged shuttering as they are.

“We know there are concerns,” he said. “Let me be clear, we are upset about its closure.”

Now, Arup workers must think up design tweaks to again shore up the once notoriously bouncy span before park-goers can set foot on it, a multi-step project that Landau said would likely drag on for an indeterminate amount of time since the firm’s initial assessment of the bridge’s recent damage took longer than planned.

“It took us a lot longer to do the testing than we hoped, and it will take longer for us to design the appropriate solution than you would like it to take,” he said.

The water damage is a particularly bedeviling problem because the wood used to build the $4-million, taxpayer-funded footbridge — black locust — is supposed to withstand heavy moisture, according to Landau.

“Every wood expert we spoke to said black locust is the best there is — you could put it into a vat of water for 100 years and you’d never have deteriorat­ion,” he said. “So we were really surprised, as was our wood expert, when they discovered that we had a piece with decay.”

Landau shared the news during an unrelated Sept. 12 meeting about plans for the new public swimming hole coming to Squibb Park, roughly three months after he told locals he couldn’t promise that construction of the pool won’t require closing the crossing.

And as Squibb Bridge’s latest closure hits the two-month mark, its time out of service continues to increase compared to its time in service, with the span being off limits for roughly 34 months, and open to the public for only about 32, since it debuted in May 2013.

The crossing’s previous 32-month closure ended when it reopened with less spring in its step last April, as buyers were shelling out millions to purchase luxury condos inside the then just-finished Pierhouse complex that sits in Brooklyn Bridge Park adjacent to the span, leading some locals to wonder whether the real reason Squibb Bridge recently shuttered is to keep looky-loos from peeking into the swanky homes.

“Maybe the people living in the pricey apartments don’t like people peering at them,” a commenter who identified herself as Teresa wrote on the Brooklyn Heights blog after the span closed in July.

A longtime neighborhood resident said he could understand such privacy concerns, but insisted claims that the bridge shuttered due to condo owners’ complaints are pure speculation.

“If I had a million-dollar condo there and got up in the morning to stretch, I wouldn’t want people looking at me, but buyers bought units knowing the bridge was there,” said Andrew Porter. “People are making assumptions, these are rumors.”

And even though he could not say when, Landau promised locals that the span will reopen as soon as possible, though the cost of getting back in bridgeness won’t be determined until engineers are further along with their repairs, according to a park spokeswoman.

“No matter how long it takes, we are committed to having a bridge that connects from Squibb Park to Brooklyn Bridge Park,” Landau said.

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Posted 12:00 am, September 17, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Jim from Cobble Hill says:
Man, you can just smell the bullshiat from space. If the "wood is degrading" as they say, then just replace it with synthetics. This is just another way someone is funneling/extorting a bribe involving these shady DeBloomberCuomZio real estate cronies.
Sept. 17, 2018, 8:01 am
Jay from Downtown says:
The bridge closure is a scam to cater to the condo residents. Dear reported ask Arup, the engineers who reviewed the design whether their design is ok...they supposedly corrected the earlier design. I think the earlier closure was also a scam and all it did was allow for the construction of the condos without the additional expense of putting protective scaffolding around the bridge. Where are the lawsuits, etc. against the original and second designer or contractor?...there are not because it is all BS!
Sept. 17, 2018, 8:45 am
Billy from Sunset Park says:
Jim is one can be that incompetent, we are not being told the entire story. I'd suggest to those living there that they should just go on with their lives as they did before the bridge. Don't hold your breath waiting for its completion.
Sept. 17, 2018, 12:32 pm
Charles from Bklyn says:
From the previous and current behavior of the board and developer, we should assume the bridge is closed to stop public access. What fools we are to elect a government so corrupt as the one we have, which gave away the waterfront to rich people.
Sept. 17, 2018, 3:49 pm
ujh from Westchester says:
Pierhouse residents, how about having curtains installed, which shield your private lives from peering passers-by 24/7?
Sept. 17, 2018, 4:30 pm
Man from Brooklyn says:
An ugly "bridge" in an inaccessible location. Tear it down.
Sept. 17, 2018, 11:20 pm
David Weinkrantz from Downtown Brooklyn says:
If the taxpayers (which taxpayers?) paid $4 million to build the bridge, do we have to shoulder the $3 million repair cost? How extensive is the repair that it costs almost as much as the original construction?
Sept. 18, 2018, 3:29 am
Henry Ford from Brooklyn says:
They should open it and let all the liberals and non-whites plunge to their deaths, making Brooklyn great again.
Sept. 18, 2018, 10:50 am
Man from Brooklyn says:
HF, Brooklyn would be great again if you plunge first.
Sept. 18, 2018, 3:55 pm
bing from bong says:
√ision Zero agrees with Man from Brooklyn, but someone was sloppy when plagiarizing lil hank. He's proud of his racist bay ridge roots.
Sept. 18, 2018, 6:05 pm
Pierhouse Dad from Brooklyn Heights says:
Dear Conspiracy Theorists: Pierhouse residents are up in arms about the bridge closure. It cuts off a link to the neighborhood that we all use. It is insanity to think otherwise. As a matter of fact we have been aggressively lobbying the BBP leadership for a timeline to reopen and forced a meeting with leadership to get answers. We have kids and families just like you do. We want access to the subway and pay fees to make sure that the park is enjoyed by all. The generalizations as residents as "entitled" is a joke. How much is a brownstone in the Heights these days? Yeah, glass houses. Agree that it should be a simple fix. Build a metal bridge that doesn's zig zag or look pretty, but gets the job done!!
Sept. 21, 2018, 10:45 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: