Today’s news:

4th Avenue left waiting at the station

The Brooklyn Paper

The MTA giveth and the MTA taketh away.

This time, the almighty transportation agency has abandoned its ambitious plans to renovate the shabby Fourth Avenue station in Park Slope into a glittering, light-filled, Euro-styled stunner.

Just last November, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority showed off renderings (left) of the elevated F-train platform basking in sunlight from new windows, renovations that were part of a larger project to reconstruct the crumbling elevated tracks on the F and G line between the Carroll Street and Fourth Avenue.

The trackwork is still set to start later this year and finish in 2012. And improvements to the equally beleaguered Smith–Ninth Street station are still slated to begin next year.

But the overall $250-million project has been trimmed to $187.8 million, so something had to give, said Deirdre Parker, a spokeswoman for New York City Transit.

“Work on the Fourth Avenue station was never officially funded,” Parker said in an e-mail — one that contradicts an announcement made at a Community Board 6 meeting last November. “Consideration has been deferred until the next capital plan.”

Station appearances are not as important as the system’s functionality, but it does matter to riders.

“Aesthetics and cleanliness matter to the experience of riders,” said Noah Budnick, deputy director of Transportation Alternatives. “To think that those things don’t affect the quality of your ride and your experience misses the reality of transit riding.”

Other MTA critics said it was disingenuous for the plans to be touted publicly only to be quietly dropped months later.

“They have to have a public dialogue,” said Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign.

Local subway riders were just as withering in their rebukes to the agency.

“It’s a bad thing that it’s not going to be remodeled,” said Rosanny Fernandez. “When you’re waiting for the train, you want to feel like you get what you paid for.”

Others said the refurbishments were not a priority compared to the condition of other stations.

“I was really excited that they were going to redo it, but my first reaction was that they should do Smith-Ninth first,” said Jeremy Olsen, who lives nearby on 11th Street.

Looks like the MTA agrees with him.

Of course, it’s not the first time that a much-ballyhooed improvement went from front-burner to back (or, more accurately, into the basement),

Following a fare hike and weeks after promising to spend $30 million on expanded service in his state of the MTA address in March, Elliott Sander, the agency’s executive director, backtracked on the promise, forcing Brooklynites to forgo bus service from Red Hook to Manhattan, better G-train service, an extension to the B67 to Fulton Ferry in DUMBO, and other improvements.

— with Marie Cunningham

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

JF from Queens says:
Where was Joan Millman when the legislature cut $50 million from the MTA budget? She didn't come out in favor of congestion pricing until it was much too late.

http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/23/congestion-pricing-joan-millman-is-not-convinced/
http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/07/breaking-joan-millman-to-vote-yes-on-pricing/
June 7, 2008, 1:45 pm
Michael from Bay Ridge says:
The Fourth Avenue station is in much better condition than Smith/9th street, and I don't see why a cosmetic improvement is neccessary (not that it wouldn't be nice - although I don't like the refubishments made on the R line stops in downtown Manhattan).
I would prefer if more money went into late night train service. Late at night the trains run so infrequently that they are almost unusable. Aren't we proud to have a 24 hour subway.
Give me a functional, all hours, dirty/ugly subway over the pretty and closed at night subways you find in other cities.
June 10, 2008, 11:47 am
amzad89 from park slope says:
aww they shouldnt say never mind to it. i think its a great idea, the old look of the fourth subway line was looking so old and ugly, and paint was coming off. i hope for this to be gone, and the future is here, if there can be newer trains ,and buses, why not renovate this station and make it look nicer??
May 23, 2009, 3:19 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links