Today’s news:

Mr. Quadrozzi, tear down this wall!

The Brooklyn Paper

An 18-foot-tall, corrugated wall obstructing the waterfront view in Red Hook Park must come down, a state court ruled, but some parents would rather see the barrier stand tall.

The park’s neighbor, John Quadrozzi Jr., the owner of the Gowanus Industrial Park, illegally built the 200-foot-long partition on his land to separate it from the shallow watery basin that abuts Red Hook Park because trespassing was a problem and the city’s four-foot-high fence was hardly a deterrent, he told The Brooklyn Paper.

“We would no sooner chase people over the fence, turn our backs and they would hop back over,” he said.

The city’s victory in State Supreme Court capped a two-year court quest to tear down the fence, near Clinton Street, and restore public access to — or at public sight of — the waterfront.

Moreover, Quadrozzi said he needed the fence to abide by city regulations to block granular material like the road salt he stockpiles on his property from blowing into the park.

“Not only were we permitted to put it up, but we were required to put it up,” Quadrozzi said.

But the Parks and Law departments charged that Quadrozzi didn’t have permission to erect the “unsightly” barrier and obstruct waterfront view.

State Supreme Court Justice Robert Miller agreed, ruling that “the fence significantly and unreasonably restricts the common use of the waterfront and does not serve the public good.”

The city’s victory, which Quadrozzi vows to appeal, capped a two-year court quest to tear down the fence, near Clinton Street, and restore public access to — or at least public sight of — the waterfront. But not everyone wants the view of the Erie Basin.

In interviews, some parents said the beckoning, open seas are too much for their mischievous children to resist.

“That wall helps keep kids out of danger. Even with it up, they still try to climb over to the other side, but this makes it harder,” said Al Soto, a retired detective and daily park visitor. “It doesn’t make any sense to me why they’d take it down when it was helping out. … It’ll be a nice view, but is it worth it?”

Many park-goers, not to mention the Parks Department, answered emphatically yes, and cheered the court’s decision, which says Quadrozzi must remove the wall in 90 days.

“I was angry when they put the wall up,” said Steven Morell. “It was a nice view of the rocks, the water, fishes —  even if there was a little trash. … It was a great part of the park environment. I’m really looking forward to it coming back.”

— with Michael Lipkin

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Christine from Williamsburg says:
I think kids that drown themselves, eat used condoms and choke, run into traffic are a direct result of poor parenting not the existence of water, used condoms, or traffic. The human race has survived much worse than public access to water front property and I will be damned if I see our world rubberized and restricted for "the sake of the children". On the other hand the image of a huge wall with all these benches facing it is kind of a profound statement. Put a title and a name of the artist on this bull—— and it would become the hottest thing in the art world.
July 6, 2008, 7:02 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links