Today’s news:

More problem$ at Brooklyn Bridge ‘Park’

The Brooklyn Paper

Yet another revenue-generating component of the beleaguered Brooklyn Bridge “Park” development is on hold because of the faltering economy, The Brooklyn Paper has learned.

Casting new doubts on the financial viability of the housing, retail and open space project along the Brooklyn Heights and DUMBO waterfront, the long-stated plan of converting the long-closed Empire Stores warehouse into a money-making retail center has been put off.

It’s the latest setback for the waterfront development and the crumbling, Civil War-era building.

Years of neglect — and an inability to agree on a developer — culminated in a partial collapse of the state-owned building in 2007 that required perimeter fencing and the closure of one entrance to Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park.

That entrance — at the corner of Dock and Water streets in DUMBO — finally reopened last week, but the larger problems remain.

The state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation told The Brooklyn Paper this week that the agency had indefinitely postponed delivering the building to the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation — which says it doesn’t want to take possession in the current economic climate.

“At some point we will pass the title on to the Brooklyn Bridge Development Corporation — but quite frankly, what they’ve been saying to us is: ‘Not right now,’” said the state agency’s Regional Director Rachel Gordon, who visited the site on Friday with state Sen. Daniel Squadron (D–Brooklyn Heights), whose office called for the reopening of the entrance.

The indefinite postponement of the Empire Stores plan comes just weeks after The Brooklyn Paper reported that two other key parts of the development’s funding stream — a 225-bed hotel planned for Pier 1, and hundreds of luxury apartments — were shelved because of the financial crisis.

But those behind the 1.3-mile-long development — whose original $150-million price tag is now $347 million — claim that everything is going according to plan.

“None of the revenue generating sources are cancelled or off the table,” said spokeswoman Lisa Willner in an e-mail.

That said, she added, “We do not have a schedule to release RFPs for either of these development sites because of the current economic climate.”

Willner said that operating expenses for the portion of the park development that is expected to be finished by the end of next year — small recreation areas at Pier 1 and Pier 6 — are being covered by revenue from the One Brooklyn Bridge Park condo development, which is expected to net about $3 million per year.

“After that, we will phase in the hotel, residential buildings and the Empire Stores over time as the remainder of the park is built and additional commensurate operating funds are needed. However, we have a few years before that,” she said.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Don from Brooklyn Heights says:
This news was already reported weeks ago in the NY Post. Is this where you "learned" it?
Feb. 19, 2009, 4:06 pm
sid from Boerum Hill says:
I never thought that the Empire Stores would generate much pilots. Its primary use was for educational facilities....and that pays no real estate taxes. I know the Brooklyn paper hates the Brooklyn bridge park but does it have to resort to yellow journalism?
Feb. 19, 2009, 4:43 pm
Gersh Kuntzman (Brooklyn Paper) says:
As a point of information, the New York Post followed our initial coverage of the ongoing revenue problem at Brooklyn Bridge Park, not the other way around in this case.

Thanks for reading!
Feb. 19, 2009, 5:25 pm
Mara from Williamsburg says:
I've been thumbing through related stories on Brooklyn Bridge Park and although I am reading old news, I want to go on record as saying that I wish the Brooklyn Paper would stop pretending that Brooklyn Bridge Park will not be an actual park - this is what I take to be the reason that you constantly say "park" instead of park.

This is a tiresome conceit and it flies in the face of the reality of the situation. If you don't like this "park", please, send it on up to my neighborhood.
April 10, 2009, 2:26 am
Rosaa from Santa Ana says:
Verryyyy goooood informantionnnnn , helped me ALOT !!!!!!!!
June 7, 2011, 4:52 pm
RosaaAAA from Santa Ana says:
WITHHH JENNNYO, gooood infoooo.
June 7, 2011, 4:52 pm
Alicia from Anaheim says:
goood onnne

rock onn duddee
June 7, 2011, 4:53 pm
Alejandraa from Colorado says:
Gooooood Onnnnee , best story eveer , i am in , loveeee !!!!! call mee 9112342133
June 7, 2011, 4:54 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.