Sections

Where will the Gowanus Canal’s toxic sludge go?

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Dredging the Gowanus Canal is one thing — deciding what to do with the polluted muck recovered from the waterway is another challenge altogether. After scraping up tons of toxic sludge from the bottom of the canal, the Environmental Protection Agency is considering seven ways to dispose of the contaminated mess:

• Barging the waste to a treatment plant, then sending it off to a landfill.

• Trucking the muck to a treatment plant, before banishing it to a landfill.

• Burning the treated sludge with coal to generate electricity, in a process known as cogeneration.

• Turning the foul substance into landfill for another, unspecified project.

• Converting the toxic goop into concrete blocks for use around the canal.

• Storing the contaminated material in a confined facility at an undisclosed location.

• Stashing the stuff in a similarly impenetrable place somewhere near the Gowanus.

Of course, the feds don’t have to worry about the problem just yet: the actual clean-up of the canal isn’t scheduled to start until 2016, at the earliest. But that hasn’t stopped neighbors of the foul-smelling body of water from wondering what will happen to all that dirty mud.

“Who would possibly accept it — and where is going to get stored before it gets moved?” said Bill Appel, the executive director of the Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation. “There’s a lot of unanswered questions.”

Reach reporter Daniel Bush at dbush@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-8310. Follow him at twitter.com/dan_bush.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Moses from Park Slope says:
This is not an explainer
Jan. 12, 2012, 9:08 am
Josef from Clinton Hill says:
a discussion of the pros and cons of each potential strategy would not go amiss, but absent that I'm voting for cogeneration.
Jan. 17, 2012, 1:21 pm
Dave from Park Slope says:
Can we dump it on Bruce Ratner's head like Gatorade if the Nets ever reach the .500 mark?
Jan. 23, 2012, 11:31 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.