Rendering of a-park-ment tower ignites firestorm of angry e-mails

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Proving that a picture is truly worth a thousand words, a community activist and longtime supporter of the plan to build a Brooklyn Bridge Park set off a flurry of anxious e-mails this week when he distributed a computer-generated image of what he believes a planned 30-story condominium tower at the park’s southern end would look like.

Roy Sloane, a member of the Cobble Hill Association who owns a small advertising agency and specializes in graphic design, circulated an e-mail with an image he created depicting how the park would appear from a western-facing view at Atlantic Avenue.

“My goal was to get an accurate picture out there and have an open discussion,” said Sloane, who opposes plans by the park’s state-appointed development corporation to finance the annual $15.2 million operating budget by building five luxury residential buildings.

Unlike most parks in the city, Brooklyn Bridge Park, which is planned for the waterfront roughly between the Manhattan Bridge overpass and Atlantic Avenue, is mandated to be self-sufficient, paying for its own costly maintenance. The city and state have agreed to finance the estimated $150 million it will cost to develop the open space, commercial and housing development.

Since the plans for the housing were introduced to media and select community groups late last year, subsequent meetings held by the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation (BBPDC) and its lead designer, the landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates (MVVA), have shown attendees various renderings of what the park would look like from a multitude of viewpoints as well as a model.

None of the images showed proposed luxury high-rise residential buildings near Pier 6 and Atlantic Avenue inside the park, said Sloane. One of the towers will rise to 30 stories.

Though a two-building hotel and a restaurant are planned for the park at Old Fulton and Furman streets, and a 16-story residence is planned at John and Adams streets in DUMBO, residents near the southern end of the planned park have complained about getting the brunt of the new high-rise development.

“We are paying a price, and it’s important for people to know what that price is,” said Sloane.

On July 13, he e-mailed a rendering he made of what he imagined the proposed park’s entrance to look like — a skyscraper towering above the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway overpass and neighboring former Watchtower plant at 360 Furman St. — to 51 recipients, including members of the state-mandated Community Advisory Committee to the BBPDC, the development corporation and the designers.

“My purpose is to help the public visualize how the southern entrance of Brooklyn Bridge Park will look,” Sloane said, and in the e-mail accused the BBPDC of not including “ANY renderings or images of the proposed buildings of the Atlantic Avenue entrance.”

Three architects familiar with the plans were consulted on the image, he said.

Sloane’s rendering was lambasted and called inaccurate in a response e-mailed the next day by the BBPDC’s executive director.

“The drawing is incorrect about the proposed building location and height,” wrote Wendy Leventer, in a response sent to the same distribution list Sloane had used, as well as to elected officials and members of the press.

“We would also like to correct the statement that, ‘The BBPDC has not been forthcoming with information or details regarding the buildings’,” to which she cited “three occasions where views along Atlantic Avenue have been discussed in public meetings.”

An original rendering of the Pier 6 high-rise, which Leventer claimed had been released to the public and community groups in meetings, was attached to the e-mail.

The meetings she cited, from January and February, were held in Van Valkenbergh’s offices in Manhattan, expressly for the members of the Community Advisory Committee. The meetings were publicized by invitation only, and came before a Feb. 22 open public meeting in Downtown Brooklyn.

Van Valkenbergh had a similar reaction, saying Sloane’s image was misleading, and providing what he called a “to-scale” version.

“Renderings put forth by certain members of the community do not accurately portray the actual development at Pier 6, which is needed to help define and fund the park. In fact, they distort the development,” wrote Lee Silberstein, a spokesman for Van Valkenburgh, in an e-mail to The Brooklyn Papers.

“A visual presentation and design concept for the project have been repeatedly shown to the community,” he wrote.

Silberstein added that the image sent out by the BBPDC in response to Sloane’s e-mail was first shown as part of a Power Point presentation at a community meeting on April 16 at Long Island College Hospital.

Sloane said the image has not widely enough been made public. “We don’t have anybody that recalls seeing it,” he said, referring to the CAC.

As of press time, the BBPDC Web site did not contain the rendering.

Silberstein added, “There’s no better way for people to see what the proposed development is going to be than to take a look at the model. Any rendering is going to be from an artist’s perspective and is open to interpreta­tion.”

Sloane used a different terminology.

“They cheated it,” he said of the BBPDC rendering. “It’s not from the pedestrian’s viewpoint, it’s back further from the street.

“That’s why they didn’t play it up,” said Sloane. “It wasn’t distributed, it wasn’t widely circulated, it wasn’t up on the Web site and it wasn’t released to the press.”

Tour of piers

About 50 community members met in the muggy, sweltering heat at Fulton Ferry Landing Tuesday night to take a walking tour of the piers slated for Brooklyn Bridge Park development and get the first up-close look at the East River site, guided by Matthew Urbanski, a principal of Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates.

Most of the attendees were members of the Community Advisory Council to the development corporation, who had been notified by e-mail of the gathering.

Standing on various pylons, bollards and stairs to project his voice over the roar of Furman Street traffic and boats jetting across the harbor, Urbanski gestured to where new landscaping, plantings, plaza areas, access roads and buildings would be situated for the new park.

At Pier 1, he stopped to explain how the two-building hotel and adjacent residential suites would be separated from Furman Street and the park by being an “island unto itself” surrounded by a street on either side.

Sandy Balboza, president of the Atlantic Avenue Betterment Association and a CAC member, thought Sloane’s images helped her visualize the impact of the building design, but the walk-through presentation spoke more to her, she said, than renderings or models.

“I think [the pictures] will show people visually what everybody’s talking about, how the housing is going to dominate the entrances,” she said.

“But I think the tour last night really said it all,” she told The Papers.

“What came out of Matt [Urbanski’s] mouth — that they want to separate the park from the housing — in other words separate the public part of the park from the private part of the park, says the housing is inside the park,” she said. “It’s always going to create a tension between the private condos and the public space.”

“I don’t know the difference between separating and privatizing. To me if you’re separating, you’re privatizing.”

Sloane agreed.

“I want to see the debate be about the entrance, not about the merits of the various drawings,” pointing out that both drawings proved the point to him: “It doesn’t look like a park, it looks like a housing development.”

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!