Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The news this week that Marianna Koval had resigned from her position as head of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy should not be treated as merely inside baseball or the shuffling of yet another bureaucratic deck.

Her departure after 10 years is nothing short of an indictment of a process that has gone on too long with virtually nothing to show for it — and we wouldn’t blame Koval if she finally saw the truth.

In her 10 years, Koval has done a good job of scheduling movies and concerts in Emprie-Fulton Ferry State Park, as well as programming events and introduceing venues like the much-loved floating pool and last summer’s “pop-up” park along the Furman Street Piers.

But Koval was also one of the staunchest advocates for the Empire State Development Corporation’s decision to finance maintenance of the project’s open-space component by putting luxury condos, a hotel and a shopping center inside the footprint of the so-called park.

This decision — and Koval’s advocacy of it — is the reason that the project is virtually dead now.

From a budget of $150 million just a few years ago, the development is now slated to cost more than $350 million, with nowhere near that allocated so far. State officials say that lawns on Pier 1 (at the foot of Old Fulton Street) and Pier 6 (at the foot of Atlantic Avenue) will be completed by the end of the year. But then, they’ve made promises before — and not a single permanent piece of the project has been completed.

In addition, most of the park’s revenue-generating uses — the hotel, roughly 800 of the 1,200 units of housing, and the Empire Stores mall — are hopelessly delayed.

It’s no wonder Koval now says she wants to spend more time with her daughter. As parents ourselves, we can obviously empathize with that desire — but if the state really intended to complete large sections of the park by the end of 2009, would Marianna Koval really be walking away from a job she says she loves?

Of course not. But given the remaining unanswered questions about the project, we’d say she’s getting out while the getting is good.

After all, it would not surprise us if Koval was simply fed up with lies and misinformation being offered by the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation. As the Cobble Hill Association pointed out this week, the park’s budget includes $61 million for utility infrastructure.

Sixty-one million dollars for utilities? That’s not a park, that’s a neighborhood.

The group also pointed out that 90 percent of the park’s budget for architecture and engineering planning has already been spent. If a park is really being built, won’t there be a lot more landscaping, design or engineering work to be done?

Maybe Marianna Koval is just seeing the writing on the wall.

Updated 5:11 pm, July 9, 2018: Story was updated to remove the byline. This article is an editorial. It was not the work of any staf reporter at The Brooklyn Paper.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

dude from bk says:
Gersh - I applaud the stance you took on the reporting of park slope coop anti-Israel ban a couple of weeks ago. You were a eloquent advocate for not turning non-stories into stories by buriyng a tiny bit of truth under a a ton of conjecture and misinformation. I only wish you applied the same principals to your reporting on Brooklyn Bridge Park.
March 6, 2009, 10:10 am
Bklyngirl from DUMBO says:
Thanks, Gersh, for reporting the truth. The "Conservancy" has raised a ton of money to conserve their social status in the Heights and their jobs. It is about time the State Parks Dept. took over this "project" and built a real park. They should appoint a park administrator, too. And let it be a park administrator not a private (non-public) partner like Koval.
March 8, 2009, 10:06 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: