Sections

Lander: Zoned collection will be safer, cleaner, cheaper

for Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

If you were designing a way to collect commercial waste — that is, garbage from businesses — you could hardly come up with something worse than our current system. Today, in my district, 39 different waste haulers are collecting waste from businesses within a single zip code. These overlapping and inefficient truck routes cause unnecessary emissions, noise, traffic, and safety hazards on our local streets.

Recycling requirements for these haulers are very weak, so New York City lags far behind other cities for diversion, recycling, or composting rates in the commercial sector. The same is true for labor standards. As a result, many waste haulers cut corners when paying and training workers who have some of the most dangerous jobs in the city.

You might think the current system would at least help small businesses through price competition, but in fact, the opposite is true. A recent study by New York City found that on average, small businesses pay 38 percent more for waste services than larger corporations, and typically don’t receive incentives or discounts for taking the trouble to sort their recyclable waste from garbage.

Finally, a grossly disproportionate share of commercial waste from across the city is trucked into our neighboring Brooklyn communities of Williamburg and Bushwick, Sunset Park, and East New York — predominantly communities of color — only to be trucked back out of the city on its way to landfills.

A real mess, all around.

That’s why I joined the Transform Don’t Trash campaign back in 2013, calling for New York to move to a zoned system for commercial waste collection — modeled on a successful effort in Los Angeles. And it’s why I was thrilled when the DeBlasio administration and the Department of Sanitation announced their plan to adopt such a system last month.

The city’s new plan will create a rational, competitive structure for the commercial waste industry. The Department of Sanitation will divide the city up into districts. Through a competitive bidding process, the agency will select a single, accountable waste hauler for each commercial district. It’s worth noting that in other large cities like Los Angeles, this process has resulted in low prices and free recycling for business customers, who will in many cases pay less than their New York City counterparts and receive better service.

Our neighborhood will benefit through a dramatic reduction in the number of truck trips — with fewer emissions, less traffic, and fewer crashes. Higher standards for recycling will increase diversion and reduce the waste the city sends to landfills. Workers will be better protected by higher labor standards. Small businesses will see fairer pricing. And low-income communities of color will be less unfairly burdened by the high concentration of waste transfer stations.

That’s a win-win-win-win-win.

The anti-reform arguments being made by private waste hauling interests who prefer the status quo are red herrings. In order to win the right to serve a commercial zone, haulers will need to vigorously compete on price, customer service, and recycling practices, and the city will retain the right to penalize or replace hauling companies that do not live up to the new standards. Moreover, Commissioner Kathryn Garcia has stated that the city intends to create opportunities for local small- and mid-sized carters to successfully compete.

As Brooklyn communities and businesses continue to grow, we can’t afford to ignore a polluting, dangerous, and unsustainable waste system any longer. I applaud City Hall for embracing a smart policy and look forward to working with our diverse businesses, communities, and industry stakeholders to implement this new system in the coming years.

Councilman Brad Lander represents Brooklyn’s 39th District, covering Park Slope, Windsor Terrace, Kensington, Gowanus, Carroll Gardens, and Cobble Hill.

Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Carmine Gallante from Hillside says:
Thanks - your payoff is on the way.
Sept. 28, 2016, 11:16 am
Julie from Williamsburg says:
Sounds responsible, efficient. Great!
Sept. 29, 2016, 4:33 pm
Charles from Bklyn says:
There has got to be a better way to reduce emissions and prices than have the government further regulate. With all respect, this seems to be something catered to serve the interests of a few.  So the government chooses the company in a zone? And then every business has to use them? Who is paying who for this change, I wonder ...
Sept. 30, 2016, 8:08 am
Terry from Park Slope says:
I agree with Carmine - someone is getting paid off either directly or indirectly. Who is funding Lander's re-election besides the teacher's and other unions? Guiliani busted up the private garbage cartels and Lander is proposing to eliminate the competition in return for a government monopoly based on zip codes. Lander shows his true racist colors when he brings in alleged neighborhoods "of color." New York City is one of the most integrated cities in the country. (Lander previously made racists comments against Asians). Lander's proposal will result in higher costs for businesses who will be hiring friends and relatives of Lander and other corrupt elected officials in return for their exclusive territory. Progressive Politicians usually want competition - to open up the playing field for the little guy - not a monopoly. But, this is what is expected of Lander whose highlights in the past year have been: Voting himself a 32% immediate salary raise; making disparaging remarks about Asian money launderers; pushing through the city council the Lander five cent per bag tax; joining the radical Jumaane Williams in refusing to salute the American flag; repeating blood libel comments about Israel; forcing the MTA to stop the restoration of the F Train express; etc. I can't wait until the 2017 primary as I plan to vote ABL - Anyone But Lander. Until then, Trump has my vote in November. Trump for President!
Oct. 6, 2016, 1:26 pm
Vlad from Kessington says:
It seems that if there is a ridiculous plan, then Lander has to be involved. Lander's proposal will restrict free trade, raise the cost of private sanitation, lead to incompetence, ultimately to corruption of city officials and campaign contributions to elected officials for their reelection fund and if this was Illinois, indictments of city officials. Since Lander has taken office, he has become a publicly hound like Charlie Schumer. However, unlike Schumer, Lander doesn't think before speaking. An example, Lander pushed for the bag tax which does nothing except suck about $500 of disposable income out of the wallets of the average New Yorker. Perhaps sanity will prevail in Albany and this nickel tax will be repealed before it starts.

If Lander wants to do something positive, then he should call for an investigation of the Obamacare plan Oscar, which will be pulling from Brooklyn almost all of its network of doctors and hospitals starting next year, leaving Brooklynites on Obamacare with few, if any, options starting in January.
Oct. 7, 2016, 11:12 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: