What the truck?! Big-rigs may clog Brooklyn Heights streets if state pols don’t grant speedier BQE repairs

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

It’s a big trucking deal.

Thousands of big-rigs may be forced to rumble along Brooklyn Heights streets if state lawmakers don’t pass legislation to accelerate the reconstruction of a decrepit stretch of the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway that runs through the nabe, according to city transit honchos, who warned locals at a Monday meeting that the roadway will soon be unable to hold the heavy vehicles.

“The corrosion in the rebar will have reached a point where the capacity of the structure to carry trucks is going to be reduced,” said Tanvi Pandya, a project manager overseeing the repairs. “We’re really concerned that we don’t miss that. We want to stay ahead of that curve.”

Department of Transportation engineers cracked open the expressway’s triple cantilever — which runs beneath Brooklyn Heights’ fabled promenade and above Furman Street — last year, and subsequently discovered that the massive trucks that cruise it daily will cause the three-tiered structure to start rapidly deteriorating in 2026, Pandya said, forcing the city to repeatedly fix problems that pop up as the cantilever crumbles or redirect the four-wheelers to local streets including Atlantic Avenue, Jay Street, and Flatbush Avenue.

“At that point, we can either keep letting the trucks on — which means we’re going to have bigger and bigger pot holes, bigger issues, and more emergency shutdowns — or we start diverting truck traffic,” she said. “Which all of you know is not the way we want to go because there’s nowhere for the trucks to go.”

The city is coughing up $1.9 billion to fix a 1.5-mile stretch of the 70-year-old span between Atlantic Avenue and Sands Street, and workers plan to begin the reconstruction in 2024 and wrap it sometime after 2028.

But local transit honchos are pushing lawmakers in Albany to pass legislation that would speed up the repairs by authorizing “design-build,” a process that would solicit one bid for the project’s design and construction instead of hiring unique firms for each phase, and cut about $113 million from the job’s total cost.

And if Gov. Cuomo approves the so-called streamlined process for the city-run project by this spring, work on the expressway could begin as soon as 2021 and end before 2026, according to the transportation department.

Cuomo previously allowed several state-run agencies to use design-build, including the New York State Department of Transportation, which implemented the process to construct the new Kosciuszko Bridge.

But he has yet to sign off on legislation approving its use by city agencies on infrastructure projects, despite Mayor DeBlasio’s and other local pols’ demands that he do so.

State Sen. Marty Golden (R–Bay Ridge) introduced legislation in Albany’s upper chamber last spring that would have authorized the city to use design-build on eight projects, including the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway reconstruction, but it never made it to the governor’s desk.

Golden told The New York Post that he plans to reintroduce the bill as soon as possible, however, and his colleague, the former assemblyman and newly elected state Sen. Brian Kavanagh (D–Brooklyn Heights), said he would urge his fellow senators to support the legislation, though he could not speak to the likelihood of it becoming law.

“I can’t speak for the other parties in this — I can tell you it’s going to be one of my top priorities,” Kavanagh said. “My new role in the Senate is to make sure everybody in Albany understands this is something we need to get done.”

City transit honchos begged locals to demand their state legislators pass the design-build legislation at Monday’s meeting, and the leader of a Brooklyn Heights civic group said he is optimistic that Albany lawmakers will do the right thing — and can’t imagine just how dramatically thousands of trucks plowing through the nabe’s narrow side streets would affect the enclave if they do not.

“This would just take a highly problematic situation and make it absolutely unbearable,” said Peter Bray, who heads the Brooklyn Heights Association. “We’re in big trouble because they are talking about 14,000–16,000 trucks a day that use the roadway, and if they have to be diverted and even half of them use streets in Downtown and Brooklyn Heights, there’s no roadway capacity to absorb that traffic.”

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Updated 5:51 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

NN from Boerum Hill says:
They should replace it with a tunnel
Dec. 13, 2017, 12:42 pm
Henry Ford from Bay Ridge says:
Hahahahaha. Just wait until the streetsblogger clowns succeed in getting the BQE torn down. This is just a preview.
Dec. 13, 2017, 1:18 pm
Sid from Boerum hill says:
A tunnel is a non starter. It would cost North of 10 billion dollars and not connect tongue Brooklyn or Manhattan bridge. There are also subway lines and infrastructure that make the building of such a tunnel almost impossible. It would better to complete the connection of the long island railroad to the Sunnyside yards and move freight that way...but you still need the bqe to make the final delivery
Dec. 13, 2017, 4:32 pm
blogger Bill from from Boerum Hill says:
Tunnel technology has changed enormously. As we contemplate cost and disruption is it unfair to locate experts to evaluate the
tunneling? $1.9 billion is the estimate and
downpayment to "fix" the BQE. How much will
a tunnel really cost, even if more? Why not
fix the problem right so the next generation
doesn't have to suffer.

Let's create a record on this so we're not
subject to speculation. Cheapo costing will
bite in the long as well as short term. Let's
think outside "the box."
Dec. 13, 2017, 7:54 pm
Sparkle from Bay Ridge says:
Why do we need all of these trucks anyway? Can’t we just transport goods by bicycle?
Dec. 14, 2017, 9:28 am
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Unfortunately for those of you anti-car fanatics, it's unlikely that the BQE will be taken down. Just like the Sheridan Expressway over in The Bronx, many fear where all the commercial vehicles will end up especially on local roads that can barely handle them. Overall, fixing the BQE is a must regardless to how much some of you really hate it. I won't be surprised if it would cost less to fix the existing highway rather than replace it with a tunnel, plus there is a possibility that a tunnel like that would cost even more than what Boston's Big Dig did, which even leaked shortly after opening despite all that was spent on that.
Dec. 15, 2017, 6:25 pm
Joe from Brooklyn Heights says:
Sid from Boreum Hill is an idiot. The tunnel is a brilliant idea - to relieve this dysfunctional highway. Tunnel under 4th Ave for trucks heading north/south over the Verrazanno and make 4th Ave a living street in the meantime. Sid honestly should go back to his perch under a bridge with the other trolls.
Dec. 16, 2017, 11:02 am
Fred from Windsor Terrace says:
Joe you must be referring to 3rd Ave. The subway is already under 4th.
Dec. 16, 2017, 3:51 pm
Sid from Boerum hill says:
Yep idiot here. Like the regional planning association I endorse a cross harbor freight tunnel ending in Sunnyside yards to take as many trucks off the road as possible. But that is a 20 yeat project. Most subways are relatively shallow cut and cover. There are exceptions and the three or so under water subway tunnels that go under brooklyn heights to the east river are among them there are also water tunnels in the area so a tunnel under the area would have to be extremely deep. When they extended the 7 line to the javits center they used a tunnel boating machine that is still there. The cost of that was more than 6 billion for that. The least expensive way to build a tunnel is a method called dig and drop segments under water and then cover. It is most feasible to that in the harbor. The tunnel under the bosporous in Turkey used this method but that would still be more expensive and finally none of these could be done by the time the cantilever would be dangerous and even after one of these would be done you would still need the right of way of the current to connect to the bridges and local exits to deliver food etc. I don't oppose the concept of a tunnel
I just rather they used the money for something useful and not a pipe dream.
Dec. 17, 2017, 10:37 am
David Weinkrantz from Downtown Brooklyn says:
If the New York State Legislature would repeal the Scaffold Law, then I think it would reduce the dollar amounts each of the bids by the design-builders and thus significantly reduce the taxpayer cost.
Dec. 18, 2017, 12:36 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: