There’s snow reason not to follow shoveling laws

for Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

To the Editor,

Last winter, I became one of the 25 percent of people aged 65 and older who fall each year. It happened because I slipped on a mound of frozen snow left on a crosswalk on the corner of Berkeley Place and Seventh Avenue. Fortunately, I wasn’t injured. However, the accident led to my looking into what could be done to make sidewalks safer for pedestrians in the winter. I was pleased to find that New York City has rules and regulations intended to accomplish this.

According to the New York City Administrative Code, “every owner, lessee, tenant, occupant, or other person having charge of any lot or building must clean snow and ice from the sidewalk adjacent (i.e., in front of, on the side of, and in back of their properties).” If a snowstorm ends:

• Between 7 am and 4:59 pm, sidewalks must be cleared within four hours.

• Between 5 pm and 8:59 pm, sidewalks must be cleared within 14 hours.

• Between 9 pm and 6:59 am, sidewalks must be cleared by 11 am.

For example: If the snow stops falling at 7 pm, the person in charge of any lot or building has until 9 am the following morning to clear adjacent sidewalks of snow and ice.

The city’s rules and regulations state that snow and ice should be cleared from sidewalks in order to create a path for pedestrians that is at least four-feet wide. Corner-property owners should clear paths to their crosswalks, including any pedestrian ramps, and, where the snow has melted and created a puddle, disperse water away from the crosswalk. In addition, snow and ice must be removed from sidewalks next to bus stops and hydrants. “Snow may not be thrown into the street. If the snow or ice becomes frozen so hard that it cannot be removed, the sidewalk may be strewn with ashes, sand, sawdust, or similar suitable material within the same time limits,” according to the code.

The Department of Sanitation, which is responsible for enforcing the code governing the removal of snow and ice, can issue summons for failing to clear sidewalks adjoining private property within the stated time frames. The fines for failing to comply with the city’s snow and ice removal regulations are: $100–$150 for the first offense, $150–$350 for the second offense and $250–$350 for the third and subsequent offenses.

Violations should be reported after the snow has stopped falling and the grace period for cleaning snow is over. They should be reported to the NYC 311 Customer Service Center either by phoning 311 or by using the short online form on the 311 website Complaints about snow or ice on sidewalks in front of public property, such as bus stop shelters, park paths, or schools, can be made at any time. Because much of the enforcement of snow removal regulations is complaint-driven, it is important to report violations. If you are aware of someone who frequently ignores the regulations, you should encourage your neighbors to join you in reporting these violations to 311.

Failure to comply with snow- and ice-removal regulations poses another risk to property owners. As advertisements of law firms point out at this time of year, anyone who has been injured as a result of a fall on a snow- or ice-covered sidewalk can sue the party responsible for clearing the sidewalk for damages.

The city has established a program to assist resident homeowners who are 60 or older, or are permanently or temporarily disabled, or homebound. The program connects them with volunteers willing to shovel snow in their zip code. It should be noted that volunteer matches are not guaranteed. Anyone needing assistance or willing to volunteer to shovel snow should phone 311.John Casson

Park Slope

Put responders first

To the Editor,

The media is reporting that the World Trade Center Victims Compensation Fund is being depleted at an alarming rate and may stop payments to first responders by 2020. What a sad occurrence, as all too many brave souls from the police, fire, EMS, transit, and construction pitched in during these horrific days, and now are experiencing debilitating diseases.

It is a wonder that the federal government didn’t make the terrorist homelands pay through the nose, though, I guess, we Americans will wind up footing the final bill.

In addition, let’s look into the lawyers, circling like sharks, advertising their “wins” in World Trade Center cases. I know that millions of dollars from payouts from this fund, needed for responders, went into their deep pockets.

I count my blessings that I am relatively healthy, though, let’s push for adequate funding for the responders, to ease their and their families’ pain.Robert W. Lobenstein

Sheepshead Bay

R train pain

To the Editor,

There are many flaws to proposals by some elected officials to divide the current R subway line service into two sections (“R they serious? Straphangers blast pols’ proposal to again split Bklyn, Manhattan R-train service” by Julianne McShane online Feb. 26).

One would run from Continental Avenue-Forest Hills in Queens to South Ferry in Manhattan. The second section would run from Bay Ridge-95th Street and Fourth Avenue to Court Street Downtown. Thousands of Brooklyn riders would have to transfer at Pacific Street, Lawrence Street, or Court Street stations to other subway lines for connections to Manhattan, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island. Many of these other subway lines are already operating at 100-percent capacity. Thousands of Queens and Manhattan residents would have to change at 59th Street, Times Square, 34th Street, or Union Square stations in Manhattan to reach Brooklyn. This transfer will add several minutes to everyone’s trip. Imagine the problems for those coming and going to Staten Island via the ferry if this connection is severed. Those who count on connections to the Staten Island Ferry (which runs less frequently than the subway) could be subject to even longer commutes.

Work to repair and protect against future flooding of the Montague Tunnel used by the R line as a result of superstorm Sandy in 2012 cost $250 million. It began in August 2013 and was completed in September 2014, one month ahead of schedule and under budget. Grant funds from the Federal Transit Administration Superstorm Sandy Recovery and Resiliency program paid for this work.

All federally funded assets have a useful life. It was assumed that this work would extend the useful life of this 100-year-old tunnel by 50 years or more. The MTA at the start of each federal fiscal year after Oct. 1 submits an Annual Certification and Assurances to the FTA, which maintains funding eligibility. This document includes confirmation that all previously funded federal assets are being maintained and continue to remain in transit service. The MTA must also sign a Master Grant Agreement upon receipt of funding, which also documents the same promise. Every two years, MTA must also conduct a physical inventory of all federally funded assets worth $5,000 or more. This is the basis for submital to the FTA of a Bi-Annual Certification for all federally funded inventory that is still in use. If the MTA fails to keep any federally funded asset in transit service for the anticipated full useful life, the FTA has a legal right to ask for its money back. Reimbursement cost is frequently calculated on straight line depreciation of the asset. In short, the MTA could end up having to pay back Washington more than $200 million if the Montague Tunnel no longer remains in active transit service.

If this is ever implemented and the Montaghue Tunnel is no longer used, don’t be surprised when the respective Offices of Inspector General for the MTA and FTA, city Comptroller Scott Stringer, and state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli begin to take an active interest.

Sooner or later, they will initiate their own respective review to see if there has been any waste, fraud, or abuse of taxpayers dollars. Their respective audits and reports will make interesting reading. Upgrading the existing signal system and providing more service might make more sense. Perhaps those elected officials who support this crazy idea might be better off attempting to find additional capital and operating dollars to pay for improving the full route of R-line service.Larry Penner

Great Neck

Posted 12:00 am, March 9, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
Why not extend the J from Broad Street to Bay Parkway in Brooklyn during Rush Hours? There are a lot of new residential developments along 4th Avenue.
March 9, 9:06 am
stop praying on thy neighbor from NYC says:
John Casson - stop encouraging neighbors to pray on thy neighbor. We're all victims of predatory government - their abuse of power and thirst for money. We make it, they take it. This "obligation" to shovel a "public" sidewalk was "made up by government" to shirk their responsibilities onto property owners AND to create the "BAD GUY" category in an effort to fine people - their favorite form of revenue collection. The key word is "public" and as such should be maintained by government for the "public" good. No different than the "public" street itself, property owners shouldn't be responsible to clean "public" sidewalks, especially the extra burden if there's a "public" fire hydrant, "public" bus stop, or "public" cross-walk. The "public" throws garbage on a "public" sidewalk and the property owner should clean it?! Or better yet, the "public" sidewalk breaks and the property owner has to fix it?!! Or worse, slip-&-fall on the "public" sidewalk and the property owner gets sued?!!! I don't think so!!!! Let's get government to do their job and not shirk it of on property owners. Respect thy neighbor and be kind to all.
March 9, 12:44 pm
Bob from Gerritsen Beach says:
John Casson Park Slope, I reacted with great amusement to your description of the rules and regulations of this city in regards to snow removal by its citizens. So issuing summonses by the city will correct all these problems I'm assuming your point was. If wishing could make. So that by not issuing a summons is a reason for the many problems we all face living in such a congested area. Does that rule allow for self-centered individuals who clean the snow off their car by depositing it on a clean sidewalk? I think not. How about sidewalks like you have in Park slope that are narrow with fences on one side and bumper-to-bumper cars park on the other side. Where do we deposit to snow? I remember a time parking on ninth Street off of fifth Avenue after a significant snowfall. The sidewalks were cleaned and dumped near the curb where the parking meters were. The snow was so high it nearly covered the parking meter head with 3 to 4 feet of snow on either side of the meter at least 3 feet deep and me trying to deposit the coins was hazardous if not impossible. Silly me when I came out of the store 40 minutes later to find a parking ticket on my car and silly me for thinking a parking meter attendant would be compassionate enough to understand the difficulty in feeding the meter in that situation. Oh to think back to the day when I had your naïveté thinking city rules and regulations are really designed to help the people.
March 9, 2:23 pm
stop praying on thy neighbor from NYC says:
Thanks Bob. More people like us need to speak the truth about our government and their real motivation. They use us and abuse us, and we keep falling for it. Neighbors, let's respect and support one another, and we won't need to empower this government to take advantage of us as they do. Let the first elected that's for the people fight to repeal this unjust law.
March 10, 12:40 am
Learn the difference between pray and prey, stupid says:
PRAY 1 : to make a request in a humble manner 2 : to address God or a god with adoration, confession, supplication, or thanksgiving PREY noun 1 : an animal hunted or seized for food, especially by a carnivorous animal. 2 : a person or thing that is the victim of an enemy, a swindler, a disease, etc.; gull. 3 : the action or habit of preying:
March 10, 9:06 am
Bob from Gerritsen Beach says:
stop praying on thy neighbor from NYC, thanks for the acknowledgment. Speaking the truth is always the best policy but with age, I have grown all too pessimistic in our fellow citizens. We are fighting against a stacked deck and as individuals our influence has diminished to a point where our politicians couldn't care less what we say or do regarding their performance. In 2001 Mayor Bloomberg became our leader with a personal estate valued at approximately $4 billion. 12 years later he left office, with an estate value of nearly $20 billion earning this money during one of the worst recessions since the Depression. This by accident? Did circumventing the laws of the city and run for third term have something to do with that? In 2008 Mr. Thompson ran on the Democratic ticket and received 47% of the vote while spending only 8 million in campaign funds opposed to Bloomberg one hundred and 6 million. In 2012 the Democratic Party all but ignored Thompson in favor of Deblasio. Then Republicans introduced their representative for mayor who happen to be one of the most unlikable and antiquated businessmen you could find. Assuring Deblasio's nomination. You think that was an accident or good fortune for the Democrats or a staged phony election? In 2012 the last time I saw this nationwide poll and it showed only 17% of the people approved of of the way things were going on in Washington. Yet on election day 92% of the politicians who ran for reelection were voted back into office. Apparently we have the memory of a gnat and we are getting the politicians we deserve. Good luck my friend.
March 10, 11:42 am
Pedestrian from Downtown Brooklyn says:
Sorry, it was never the government's job to clear your sidewalks - it's yours. Clearly the only way to get people to get off their butts and do it is to have fines for people who don't. Don't wanna get fined? Clean your sidewalks. Or pay someone to do it. Or move somewhere outside NYC where there aren't any sidewalks. Or rent instead of owning. But please don't put innocent pedestrians at risk because you're too lazy to do your share.
March 11, 9:48 am
Charles from Bklyn says:
For landlords, removing snow and ice is essential for reducing liability. Any landlord that fails to remove snow is playing with fire.
March 11, 11:02 am
Frank from Borough park says:
Funny how calling 311 to complain about sidewalks not cleared in the borough park area of Brooklyn, results in sanitation going out after 3 weeks, no snow visible.
March 12, 12:03 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: