March 24, 2007: Vol. 30, No. 12
Past issues
The Paper in print
RSS feeds
Print edition (PDF)
Email Alerts- The current issue
- Neighborhood Map
- Bay Ridge
- Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
- Brooklyn Heights
- Downtown, DUMBO
- Carroll Gardens
- Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
- Fort Greene
- Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
- North Brooklyn
- Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- Park Slope
- Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
- GO Brooklyn
- Brooklyn Cyclones
- Not Just Nets
- Police Blotter
- Perspective
- Parenting
- Politics
- Transit
- Media archive
- The Brooklyn Bride
- Brooklyn Boom
- Classifieds
- Merchant news
- About The Paper
- RSS Feeds
-
Lost in translation: Top Chinese editors visit Paper office
for The Brooklyn Paper
Shanghai Youth Daily Executive Editor Chang JiangYu can’t get enough of Brooklyn’s real newspaper during a visit to our DUMBO offices this week.
Similar stories
Print this story
digg
del.icio.usWe’re still scratching our heads about it, but this week, four of China’s top newspaper editors journeyed to our DUMBO offices to talk politics, media and, yes, Bruce Ratner.
The editors, from the 300,000-circulation Shanghai Youth Daily, peppered the hard-working scribes of Brooklyn’s real newspaper with questions about how free papers stay in the black (don’t ask us!), what we think of our competition (what competition?), and how we cover powerful people like Ratner (we ask a lot of questions, and Ratner ignores us).
The trip was part of a cultural exchange set up by the State Department, which naturally sees The Brooklyn Paper as a leading voice in the struggle for Truth, Justice and the American Way.
The Chinese editors were concerned with all three, especially how American local governments can condemn private property and turn it over to another private developer via eminent domain.
And all four — Director WeiBin Gong, Editor Lishou Kang, Editor Chang JiangYu, and Executive Deputy Chief Editor Yue Qian — were amazed that The Paper continues to cover development issues with a critical eye, whether or not it adversely affects our ability to get ads from real-estate developers.
We explained that we have no choice. Our competitors regularly print press releases verbatim and Ratner once even published his own newspaper so he could distort, without an editorial filter, the reality of his mega-development — so it fell to us to take up the call to provide readers with objective information about Brooklyn’s largest real-estate development.
It became clear that reporting is done a little differently on the other side of the world.
We asked our Shanghai counterparts, for example, whether they could be critical of their government.
“We can cover some controversial topics,” Yue told us. “For instance, there has been a major drought in one region for several years and many people believe it is because of the construction of the Three Gorges Dam. We were able to talk to those people.”
But, Yue quickly added, that the paper also printed a government report that said the drought was not caused by the construction of the massive dam.
“And that was that,” Yue said of his paper’s decision to print the report without a critical assessment of it.
Like we said, we’re still scratching our heads.
©2007 The Brooklyn Paper
Enter your comment below
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.
