Sections

Bailout! Feds save Ratner millions with new ruling

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

The Treasury Department has bailed out Bruce Ratner.

In a much-anticipated ruling issued late Monday, the federal agency exempted Ratner’s Atlantic Yards project from a ruling that bars the use of tax-free bonds in certain developments.

Atlantic Yards was apparently exempted because it is “substantially in progress” — a term defined as having received “preliminary approval of the government” with “significant expenditures” before Oct. 19, 2006, and with a finance plan in place that contemplated the use of tax-free bonds.

The exemption will almost certainly be challenged by project opponents.

“Ratner does not qualify,” said Daniel Goldstein, a longtime project opponent who pointed out that Ratner’s project was not approved by state lawmakers until December, 2006.

It did receive a preliminary approval in July, 2006 by the Empire State Development Corporation, a quasi-public body, though it is unclear if ESDC qualifies as “the government,” in the Treasury Department’s ruling.

An ESDC spokesman said his agency had decided that Atlantic Yards does meet the requirements for exemption from the new federal rules.

As such, Ratner’s side was hailing the ruling as evidence that the developer of the $950-million basketball arena at the corner of Atlantic and Flatbush avenues could go ahead with an estimated $800 million in tax-free financing.

“We are of course very pleased with the Treasury Department regulation,” said Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco. “The regulation will help us move forward with a project that is critical to the ongoing economic vitality of Brooklyn and the city.”

The issue at hand dates back two years, when the Internal Revenue Service proposed a regulation that would prevent cities from taking land off the tax rolls in exchange for fixed, rent-like payments called Payments in Lieu of Taxes that do not rise — like normal taxes — as property values go up. Such PILOTs are typically less than normal property taxes.

The regulation would have barred developers from using federally subsidized bonds for projects that involve PILOTs, unless the payments were structured to reflect a property’s actual value.

For two years, city and state officials lobbied the Treasury Department on Ratner’s behalf, arguing that such a regulation — if implemented — would undercut a key development tool.

The payment scheme is routinely used for public projects like hospitals, but critics have argued that when it is used to boost private developers, the program cheats ordinary taxpayers.

“It allows the city to stick it to taxpayers on behalf of developers,” said Neil DeMause, author of “Field of Schemes,” which focuses on the massive public cost of stadium financing.

Despite apparently winning the right to raise money through tax-free bonds, it’s still unclear whether Ratner will be able to find investors for those bonds, given the decline in the economy.

Indeed, the Treasury Department ruling comes after a series of blows to the failing project. Ratner said in September that he would begin construction by December, but he quickly had to backtrack on that date after a state court agreed to hear a lawsuit challenging the project’s reliance on eminent domain.

Oral arguments in that case will be next year.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

al pankin from downtown says:
this is good news, let's get this project underway. it's long overdue and will vastly improve the downtown area. let the disgruntled residents move somewhere where they will be happy, the sooner the better.
Oct. 22, 2008, 11:53 am
Charles from PS, Bklyn says:
This is bad news for taxpayers, for fundamental fairness, and for the democratic process. The question is how could the federal government decide to freeze these bonds for all U.S. cities except for the two major NY stadiums and the proposed stadium in Brooklyn? The answer must be that this is an arbitrary act from a republican federal government to a state republican mayor. My god, when will the corrupt and unreasonable actions of our respective governments end?

The Atlantic Yard project is not necessary nor reasonable, and for all those who doubt the strength of the opposition, this fight is far from over. We will grind this issue until the powerful and connected bow to the will of the middle class in these neighborhoods. It ain't gonna happen here, son. They don't say forget about it in Brooklyn for nothing.
Oct. 22, 2008, 12:58 pm
Queen of the Click from Bay Ridge says:
Ratner does not qualify for this exemption.

Isn't it strange that we are in a recession and people are going to be taxed harder than ever, yet big business still is getting breaks.

If the cutoff date was Oct. 19, 2006 and Ratner’s project was not approved until December, 2006, then every single politician throughout NYC should be speaking up. Any local politician who doesn't speak up just shows that they have been paid off.

Props to Sarah Portlock and The Brooklyn Paper for excellent reporting as usual!
Oct. 22, 2008, 6:53 pm
Alan from Sheepshead Bay says:
Looks like the Nets will be playing Basketball right in Daniel Goldstein's living room.
Oct. 23, 2008, 9:35 pm
Al from Park Slope says:
I feel this stadium will bring joy to so many Brooklynites who currently have to trek into the city, or even worse, Long Island or Jersey to take their kids to the see the circus, Disney on Ice, a basketball game, a concert, Sesame street Live....etc.

Those who are endlessly fighting to stop this stadium from happening I feel are robbing millions of Brooklynites of these great experiences of family fun right here in our own backyard.

Maybe Daniel Goldstein would like to drive me and my kids to New Jersey the next time the circus is in town as I would much rather walk down the block. Does the Daniel Goldstein realize how great it would be for local businesses to enjoy a pregame or post concert crowd in their establishments? Or maybe he just really enjoys the beautiful view of railyards and decrepid buildings from his living room window.
Oct. 24, 2008, 11:56 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

This week’s featured advertisers