Sections

Gym-nauseam! Neighbors say St. Joe’s b-ball arena is ugly

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

OK, so it’s not Atlantic Yards, but St. Joseph’s College has unleashed the borough’s second-most-divisive fight over a basketball arena by unveiling plans to build an athletic center on a landmark block of Clinton Hill.

The small commuter college’s plans for a 330-seat fieldhouse on scenic Clinton Avenue won the slam-dunk support of Community Board 2’s Land Use Committee in January, but neighborhood residents followed that 13–0 vote with a full-court press, saying that the proposed façade is too plain for a street with the most beautiful homes in Brooklyn.

“That is the premier block of the entire community,” said Society for Clinton Hill member Sharon Barnes, referring to the stretch between Willoughby and DeKalb avenues. The Pratt Mansion, a building St. Joseph’s College owns, and other historical aeries dot the block, which is part of the architecturally protected Clinton Hill historic district.

“A stark box does not seem to be the best choice,” Barnes said.

The college would not make its rendering available to The Brooklyn Paper. According to people who have seen it, the plan calls for a two-story facility where a garden and building stand now. The school maintains that it needs a gym in order for its basketball team to be viable to attract students.

The Long Island-based school was founded in 1916 and currently educates just over 1,000 students at its Brooklyn campus. Its men’s and women’s teams play at Brooklyn Tech HS.

Opponents want the college to redesign the home court or build it above the school’s large parking lot on Vanderbilt Avenue, but St. Joe’s apparently said that such a scheme is unfeasible.

“[The school is] mistaken,” said Brent Porter, an architect at the Pratt Institute. “You can have the best of both worlds.”

To realize its hoop dream, St. Joseph’s must gain the approval of the city’s Landmark Preservation Commission, which is no lay up.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

This week’s featured advertisers