Sections

James, Yassky: Ax Yards funds

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Two city councilmembers are not giving up on their bid to withhold hundreds of millions of dollars in city and state subsidies from the Atlantic Yards mega-development, despite an initial rejection by the council.

Councilmembers David Yassky (D–Brooklyn Heights) and Letitia James (D–Fort Greene) asked the council’s Finance Committee to take up the matter of those Atlantic Yards subsidies while considering a resolution calling for the state to end property-tax exemptions for Madison Square Garden.

“If we are going to say this about Madison Square Garden, we should say it about Atlantic Yards, too,” said Yassky, who said the measure would be re-introduced, this time as a freestanding resolution, not an amendment.

According to the councilmem­bers’ calculations, the proposed arena for the Nets will get close to $700 million in subsidies from the city and state.

The resolution’s failure came days after Ratner’s lawyers revealed that ongoing legal challenges to the project are likely to create “significant difficulties and cost increases in concluding the bond financing that is essential to the arena’s completion.”

That revelation came in court papers asking a state appeals panel to expedite opponents’ appeal of a recent court decision that found that the Empire State Development Corporation’s environmental review of the mega-project was legally sufficient.

“The credit markets are in turmoil at this time,” Andrew Silberfein, the executive vice president and director of finance for Forest City Ratner Companies, said in the affidavit, referring to the fluctuating costs of borrowing money. “[There] is a serious question as to whether [the state] will be able to proceed with the financing for the arena while the appeal is pending before this court.

Sal Galatioto, a sports industry banker, told the New York Times that “banks aren’t completely out of the market and the bond market is still there. But the risk is continued delay.”

Opponents scoffed at the developer’s implicit suggestion that legal challenges to the controversial project were to blame for his financial woes.

“We’re in court to defend the community’s rights,” said Daniel Goldstein of Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, one of the plaintiffs in the suit.

In addition to the environmental review case, another pending lawsuit challenges the state’s use of eminent domain.

Updated 4:35 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

MDDW from Brooklyn Heights says:
$700 Million in subsidy is an understatement of the subsidies Ratner is being given by the City and State.

Among other things he is basically being given the escalating $637.2 million arena free through an “R-TIFC-PILOT” agreement (pronounced “Artifice-PILOT”- or “Return Total Intercepted For Costs-PILOT”). (It’s a step more egregious than the George W. Bush Texas Ranger stadium financing scam.-

Then there is 139 years of real estate tax exemption.

Then several hundred million more from the State and City flat-out direct subsidies.

Then the MTA subsidy of the discount on the land Ratner is being given at below market.

The additional subsidy from the tax exempt bonds on the arena which includes exemption from state and city taxes in addition to federal.

Likewise, Ratner wants more tax exempt bonds and housing subsidies for the residential portion of his project.

Even before you get to the subsidy he garners through eminent domain abuse the figure is way over $700 million. It clearly exceeds a $ billion and the estimates that put it at close to $2 billion may not be far off.
Feb. 10, 2008, 8:55 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: