Sections
>

Levin issues a big Domi-NO

Community Newspaper Group
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Freshman Councilman Steve Levin has come out against the $1.2-billion redevelopment of the old Domino Sugar refinery on the Williamsburg waterfront, calling its 2,200 units too big for a neighborhood that has seen massive growth since a 2005 rezoning that encouraged just such development.

“The project is simply too big,” Levin said in a statement read by an aide at a hearing at Borough Hall last Thursday.

That hearing, held by Borough President Markowitz, was the latest stop for the Domino developers, the Community Preservation Corporation, on the city’s eight-month land-use review process — and came just days after Community Board 1 rejected the residential conversion of the defunct sugar refinery in a 23-12 vote.

Like the community board, Levin focused on the impact of so many apartments on a historic 11-acre site along Kent Avenue just north of the Williamsburg Bridge.

“The plan would introduce over 6,000 new residents to the neighborhood, a nearly 25-percent population increase for the half-mile area surrounding the site,” Levin’s statement said.

The councilman, making his first foray into a project that will define his first term and the future of the Williamsburg waterfront, did commend CPC’s commitment to affordable housing, which exceeds the requirement of a controversial 2005 rezoning of the waterfront to allow high-density residential construction — but Levin reiterated that he would not support the plan “unless the issues of height and density, transportation, and open space, among others, are addressed.”

Levin’s position is a significant blow to CPC, which is hoping that Markowitz will use his land-use review vote to approve their project on the grounds that it creates much-needed affordable housing, reuses a derelict site and opens up the waterfront for public access.

“Our vision is to create an economically balanced need,” said company President Michael Lappin. “Affordable housing continues to be the most-pressing need for the community.”

Levin’s opposition to the project will carry significant weight in the City Council, where members tend to defer to the local councilmember on land-use issues. As a result, Domino supporters were incensed by their new lawmaker’s statement.

“The south side is solid and fervent in its support” for Domino,” said Churches United Executive Director Paul Cogley, referring mostly to the promise of many new affordable units.

During his public hearing, Markowitz gave little indication of his position, asking questions about the amount of commercial space that the project would provide and the number of local jobs that could arise from its construction.

He needs to issue a recommendation within a month, sending the project to its next step in the review, the City Planning Commission, which is expected to approve it. After that, the project goes for review by the City Council, which no longer appears to be the shoo-in that it once was, thanks to Levin’s opposition.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Dav from Greenpoint says:
I am very surprise the Steve Levine is handling situations he is against Rose Plaza, Domino, etc. we call this starting with his left foot in wrong direction!!
We all understand he is still a puppet of his buss Vito Low-Paz and his company; it’s about time to be independent and be the men!! And prove
You’re self that you our person that can make it happen...
March 15, 2010, 3:59 pm
Jon Pippen says:
You have a developer willing to invest 1.2 billion into your neighborhood in this economy but you would rather keep a bunch of dilapidated buildings. What residents don't always realize is that new buildings are assessed at high rates and create much needed real estate taxes which add to the city coffers. Current residents in older buildings don't pay high taxes because of the RPT 1805 limitation giving them a huge tax break.
March 17, 2010, 10:40 pm
Jack Pine from Bushwick says:
Density is good in urban environments! It creates vitalit and every apartment represents acres of less sprawl and fewer cars on the road. I won't vote for levin and will tell others not to as well.
March 18, 2010, 2:16 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!