June 18, 2012 / Brooklyn news / Greenpoint / Meadows of Shame

Bushwick Inlet and 65 Commerical parks

City won’t promise to finish two long-stalled North Brooklyn parks

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

City officials will not promise to finish building two stalled North Brooklyn parks before Mayor Bloomberg’s term runs out, adding to fears in Greenpoint in Williamsburg that the long-promised waterfront recreation areas will never materialize.

Two top Bloomberg aides deflected multiple questions from councilmembers over the future of Bushwick Inlet Park and a planned open space at 65 Commercial St. last week, refusing to estimate when both projects would be complete and citing budget constraints as the cause of the delays.

“We don’t have a bottomless pit of money — right now it’s just not possible to acquire property,” said Parks Assistant Commissioner Joshua Laird. “The city has an obligation to its taxpayers.”

But open space advocates say the city also has an obligation to North Brooklyn after approving a controversial rezoning of 200 industrial blocks Williamsburg and Greenpoint seven years ago in exchange for a commitment to build hundreds of units of affordable housing, a mile-long esplanade abutting the East River, and several new parks.

A handful of sky-scraping luxury towers have sprouted at the water’s edge, but the city has only acquired half the lots between N. Ninth and N. 15th streets necessary to build Bushwick Inlet Park and failed to move Metropolitan Transportation Authority vehicles from a Commercial Street lot that’s slated to become open space.

Councilman Steve Levin (D–Greenpoint) accused the Bloomberg administration of favoring projects that could make the city money, such as the McCarren Park Pool set to open this month, while putting waterfront parkland on the back burner.

“I’ve noticed that when something is a priority of this administration, it gets done,” said Levin. “It’s a question of priorities and these parks are not priorities.”

Financial mismanagement and planning gaffes have also stood in the way of both planned open spaces.

Bloomberg officials originally valued one site on the southern edge of the 28-acre Bushwick Inlet Park at about $12 million, but a judge ruled that the area’s residential rezoning meant its value was almost eight times higher.

The city eventually settled with the property owner and bought the parcel for about $93 million, according to court papers and Council testimony.

Last year, the city informed N. 10th Street property owner Norm Brodsky that it doesn’t have the funds to purchase his lot, which has been rezoned for parkland.

City officials blamed Kent Avenue property owners for highballing the administration and rejected calls to seize the properties by eminent domain.

“The last conversation we had didn’t leave us very optimistic,” said Carolee Fink, senior advisor to Deputy Mayor Robert Steel. “If that property owner will decide to reenter negotiations we’ll do that.”

Money to build a park at Commercial Street dried up too.

In 2007, city budget hawks removed $13 million of the $14 million allocated to the park’s development and spent it on other projects.

And last month, The Brooklyn Paper learned that a deal to move MTA vehicles stored at the Commercial Street lot unraveled when the Department of Transportation refused to house them on its South Williamsburg property, forcing negotiators to scramble for an alternate site.

Bloomberg aides believe the city could raise funds by selling the air rights around 65 Commercial St. to developers and may find a new location for the MTA’s trucks in the coming weeks.

But Levin doubts the city will follow through on its new promises.

“This is about credibility, doing what you say you’re going to do,” said Levin. “You have no concrete plan. When you want to do something, you have a plan.”

Reach reporter Aaron Short at or by calling (718) 260-2547.
Updated 5:34 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Juan from Gowanus says:
Taking by eminent domain to make a park is exactly what eminent was intended to be used for. The fact that the city is not willing to even put the threat of it on the table says a lot about how unserious they are about this.

Not to mention the fact that if they gave a —— they would have bought the land before they tripled its value by rezoning it. It's either that, or they are just morons.
June 18, 2012, 8:43 am
legal beagle says:
Even if the city condemns the property (takes it by eminent domain), it has to pay far market value. The only change is the forced, rather than negotiated, sale.

I love how Ass't Comm'r Laird spins his division's screw-up of the land acquisition as fiscal responsibility. Sorry, dude; ain't buyin' it.
June 18, 2012, 12:35 pm
Tg from Ps says:
But they have to spend bike lanes and all the restructuring thAt goes along with it!
June 18, 2012, 12:53 pm
Dave from PS says:
Nice try, Tg. Your illiteracy got in the way of your dumb comment.
June 18, 2012, 1:08 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: