Sections

Rail talk: BQX advocates invite trolley experts to discuss streetcar system with biz owners

Looking ahead: Advocacy group for the Brooklyn-Queens Connector Friends of the BQX hosted a panel discussion Tuesday with entrepreneurs and streetcar experts from cities across the country at the Brooklyn Brewery.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

They’re ready to roll!

Advocates of Mayor DeBlasio’s beloved Brooklyn–Queens streetcar project are so confident officials will fill the scheme’s $1-billion funding gap that they invited experts from other cities with trolley systems to discuss such infrastruc­ture’s pros and cons with local business owners on Tuesday.

The city’s recent decision to tap an engineering firm to conduct an environmental-review for the so-called Brooklyn Queens Connector is sign enough that the project won’t derail, according to the leader of the project’s main advocacy group.

“I think actions speak louder than words, and we’re seeing action from the city to move it forward,” said Jessica Schumer, the daughter of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D–New York), who runs the Friends of the BQX. “It is moving forward. The city just announced it is starting its environmental-review process, so that’s a really exciting opportunity to get the community to weigh in on it, evaluate the impacts of the project, and the necessary steps to move it forward.”

Last month, officials awarded a $7.2-million contract to firm VHB to study how the light-rail will affect neighborhoods it is set to snake through, which include Red Hook, Gowanus, Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill, Downtown, Williamsburg, Greenpoint, and other areas in distant Queens. That news came months after Hizzoner dialed back his initial promise that the streetcar — whose initial $2.5-billion budget ballooned to $2.73-billion — would pay for itself via tax revenue generated by development along its tracks, and called on the Feds to foot $1 billion of its price taga request Brooklyn pols on both sides of the political aisle deemed unlikely at the time.

But part of the environmental review will be looking into other revenue streams, according to Schumer, who said there’s still plenty of time for the Feds to come through with some cash, too.

“The environmental review is looking at all types of funding,” she said. “Federal funding is one of the options and we’re glad the city is looking at it. You never know.”

Schumer and her group hosted four speakers — hailing from Seattle, Wash.; St. Paul, Minn.; Kansas City, Mo.; and Portland, Ore. — at the recent small-business summit emceed by Borough President Adams, where the visitors explained how entrepreneurs from those cities got involved in the construction of their trolley systems, and tackled issues relating to construction, parking, and displacement.

The St. Paul panelist, who also leads a do-good group in her hometown, said the Midwestern city’s light rail helped revitalize some vacant, transit-starved areas, but in turn raised some property costs to prices that threatened to push out long-time locals for new residents with deeper-pockets.

“We are worried about gentrification, because in many of our neighborhoods we want to be sure that this investment is really truly benefiting the people that have been there, and that’s always a challenge,” said Isabel Chanslor, the vice president for national programs at the Neighborhood Development Center in St. Paul.

Chanslor admitted that St. Paul’s trolley didn’t hike property values on its own — pointing to other causes such as an influx of younger residents to the city in the decade since the streetcar debuted. Still, she encouraged local officials to demand that any developer who might receive tax breaks or subsidies for building along the Brooklyn–Queens light rail in turn reinvest in nearby communities.

“If any city, state, or federal money went into those projects, there should be a mandate that says, ‘Okay what are you willing to provide as a community benefit?’ It either has to be a small space for a small business to incubate at a lower rent rate, or it has to be something that is given back to the community,” she said. “Because you can’t just have exterior ownership.”

A spokeswoman for the city’s Economic Development Corporation, the agency overseeing the streetcar project, said officials expect VHB to start its environmental review soon, which must be completed before the firm leads the scheme through the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure that the proposal must pass before any straphangers can hop aboard.

But the rep confirmed that the city still needs federal cash to complete the trolley, which it still plans to subsidize in part with tax revenue from potential development along the route, she said.

“We’re seeking federal funding to support its primary construction, as well as other sources,” said Stephanie Báez. “We’re looking at a mix of federal and city funding, in addition to value capture.”

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 6:30 pm, March 7, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Frank from Furter says:
The City's own study has reported that the "self payment" in increased taxes is a fallacy. So you would add all that development and only use the taxes for the BQX and not for the increased cost of schooling, police, fire, etc. Since you could do the same thing with a dedicated bus for 1% of the cost and that is not a typo..1 percent. is over 25 million. For the 7.2 million already spent you could have 15 new buses or operate them for 35,000 hours(at $215 per hour)
March 8, 7:42 am
Rufus Leaking from BH says:
Paging Bob Diamond! Paging Bob Diamond! They need an expert! Taxes -They think you live to fill up the trough for the piggies to waste.
March 8, 8:46 am
The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
When do the supporters of the BQX realize that this boondoggle is DOA due to not receiving money from the feds? Initially started operating in 2024 at a cost of $1.7B, now its started operating in 2029 at a cost of $2.5B.
March 8, 10:27 am
Steve from Cobble Hill says:
Let's spend $4 billion to put a trolley train in a floodplain. The trolley doesn't connect with the subway, which probably doesn't matter since the subways don't work anyway. Gov. Newsom just called off the disastrous "bullet" train in southern California after many millions of dollars had been squandered on it. It also never had a constituency except delusionary politicians. It would never not have been a loss leader. That's what the BQX is. If de Blasio's for it, you know all you need to know. The BQX has been rejected by every community it's been pitched to.
March 8, 11:17 am
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
What does it take to realize how much this is a bad idea? You can run a bus on that route for less than and without creating so much traffic. Just like congestion pricing, I feel that the BQX is just another lost cause that should have been placed in the coffin long ago.
March 8, 5:58 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: