The current issue
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Merchant news
About The Paper
RSS Feeds
CNG Boro Politics

Dog gone? Nathan’s could be victim of Coney success

The Brooklyn Paper

The city’s plans for turning Coney Island into a year round tourist destination may lead to the demolition of the world famous Nathan’s Famous hot dog stand.

That’s the main bombshell that The Brooklyn Paper discovered in the minutes after discovering the Bloomberg Administration’s unannounced release of a nearly thousand-page report on the impacts of its plans to create a new amusement park, hotels, other attractions and thousands of apartments in a wide swath of Coney Island.

The beloved frankfurter franchise — which has stood on the corner Surf and Stillwell avenues since 1916 — is a possible casualty of the controversial plan because it sits on land whose value could soar after a rezoning opens it up to development.

“[Nathan’s is] assumed to be replaced under the proposed actions with a new building, containing hotel, amusement, retail and enhancing uses,” according to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which was posted online by the city on Friday afternoon, but not announced. A press release from the Department of City Planning is embargoed until Tuesday morning.

The report is the first step in the rezoning process towards enacting Mayor Bloomberg’s vision of a 27-acre indoor-outdoor amusement zone in the so-called “People’s Playground,” a vision that is complicated by the fact that the city must spend tens, if not hundreds, of millions in taxpayer money to acquire land in the area between the landmark Cyclone roller coaster and Keyspan Park.

The area’s principal landowner, Joe Sitt of Thor Equities, opposes the city plan, but is in stalled negotiations to sell his land to the city.

Before construction can begin, the project is reviewed and voted on by the local community board, Borough President Markowitz, City Planning and the City Council — a lengthy and often bitter process, especially in sweeping undertaking like this.

In the meantime, it is unclear what Coney Island will be like this summer. Sitt has raised rents along the Boardwalk, and, with Astroland closed, it is unclear whether there will be enough activity for the rag-tag collection of bar owners and other open-air vendors to pay the new rents.

Several sources familiar with city zoning changes thought this passage meant the fast food location would be susceptible to pressure from real-estate speculators who could now buy it to create a much-larger, and more profitable, structure on the site of the current two-story structure.

And Dick Zigun, the head freak at the Coney Island USA circus sideshow, said that’s the problem.

“They [the city] are not doing what they could do to preserve truly historic structures,” he said.

Due to the holiday, officials from the city and Nathan’s were not immediately available for comment. Late on Monday, The Brooklyn Paper receieved two e-mails from city officials that reiterated that it is not the city plan to tear down the Nathan’s restaurant, but merely to rezone the area to stimulate development.

Indeed, the Nathan’s company, which owns the iconic frank shack, could hold onto the site and develop it itself, one city official reminded.

And on Tuesday, The Paper received this statement from Nathan’s CEO Eric Gatoff: “We remain committed to Coney Island in the long-term and we fully intend to maintain our historic flagship restaurant at 1310 Surf Avenue. … As to the latest report issued by the City, we believe the information relating to Nathan’s Famous is being misinterpreted and that there is no intention to replace or demolish our flagship location.”

The full impact statement is available at www.nyc.gov/oec.

UPDATED AT 10:30 PM ON JAN. 19: Story was lengthened to include a comment from Dick Zigun and more context about the city plan.

UPDATED AGAIN AT 2 PM ON JAN. 20: Story was updated to include a comment from Nathan’s.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Brooklyn Paper Parent
Water Street Restaurant

Links