June 9, 2007: Vol. 30, No. 23
Past issues
The Paper in print
RSS feeds
Print edition (PDF)
Email Alerts- The current issue
- Neighborhood Map
- Bay Ridge
- Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
- Brooklyn Heights
- Downtown, DUMBO
- Carroll Gardens
- Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
- Fort Greene
- Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
- North Brooklyn
- Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- Park Slope
- Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
- GO Brooklyn
- Brooklyn Cyclones
- Not Just Nets
- Police Blotter
- Perspective
- Parenting
- Politics
- Transit
- Podcasts
- The Brooklyn Bride
- Brooklyn Boom
- Classifieds
- Merchant news
- About The Paper
- RSS Feeds
-
Similar stories
Print this story
digg
del.icio.usA city commissioner has apologized to a group of Brooklyn College art students for ordering the removal of what he deemed “inappropriate” artwork from a war memorial last May, an incident that incited free-speech activists, and provoked a First Amendment lawsuit.
As part of that lawsuit’s settlement this week, the city paid the students’ $40,000 legal bill and gave each of the 19 litigants $750. In addition, Parks Department Borough Commissioner Julius Spiegel issued a contrite apology.
“I apologize to the Brooklyn College art students who spent long hours and considerable effort in creating their artwork and in mounting their exhibition at the Brooklyn Memorial site,” read the apology, printed on Parks Department letterhead.
Spiegel’s long-awaited apology puts a happy ending on a saga that began after he shut down the students’ exhibition in the World War II Memorial in Cadman Plaza Park claiming to be acting on behalf of veterans, who would supposedly have been offended by artwork that included a sculpture of a hand holding a penis and a painting describing a homosexual encounter between the artist and Dick Cheney.
Spiegel’s move sparked student protests and, ultimately, a lawsuit filed on their and their professor’s behalf by First Amendment lawyer Norman Siegel.
Spiegel’s apology claimed that he “had no role in the removal and subsequent damage to Plaintiffs’ artwork,” but admitted that he was responsible “for ordering the closing of the Plaintiffs’ art exhibit.”
Marni Kotak, one of the artists whose work was removed, said she was “very happy with the statement from the city. It’s really strong.”
“We’re hoping that it will somehow deter future violations of student artists’ First Amendment rights,” added Kotak.
©2007 The Brooklyn Paper
Enter your comment below
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.
